Rogers v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.

Decision Date17 October 1923
Citation246 Mass. 478
PartiesJUNE ROGERS v. BOSTON ELEVATED RAILWAY COMPANY.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court

October 16, 17 1923.

Present: RUGG, C.

J., BRALEY, DE COURCY, PIERCE, & JENNEY, JJ.

Negligence, Street railway.

At the trial of an action of tort by a woman against a street railway company for personal injuries alleged to have been received when the plaintiff was "precipitated" from a so called "snake car" of the defendant to the ground through negligence of the defendant, the only evidence was testimony of the plaintiff, which tended merely to show that, when she boarded the car, she had ample room; that, after she was seated, the car became crowded; that as she approached her destination

"she got up and tried to get near the door and with hard struggling and pulling she managed to get out to the vestibule; that then she got pushed out of the door; that the conductor was standing at his post in the vestibule or centre compartment that he never said a word; that he stood right there; that when she went through the door, she didn't know what happened to her; . . . that the conductor . . . started the car right off, and did not move from his post." A verdict was ordered for the defendant. Held, that the verdict rightly was ordered.

TORT for personal injuries received when the plaintiff, a passenger on a car of the defendant, "was crowded and precipitated from said car to the ground and severely and permanently injured in consequence of the negligence of the defendant and its agents and servants, while acting in the course of their employment as said agents and servants, when she was in the act of alighting at a usual stopping place." Writ dated December 20, 1916.

The action was tried before Flynn, J. The entire testimony relating to the accident, as stated in the record, was as follows:

The plaintiff testified that on the afternoon of the day in question "at about ten minutes past seven in the afternoon, she took passage on one of the defendant's cars on the lower level of the Forest Hills station . . . on her way from Boston, . . . in the direction of West Roxbury . . ., that she entered the car by the front door and got a seat and was seated all the way from the station to the first stop; that the car waited a while after she got in, and it got quite crowded that a good many passengers got on afterwards and the car became very crowded; that it was jammed full; that `they were mostly leaning over on you where you were seated it was so crowded in the passage;' that the condition of the center compartment was just as bad; that the whole car was jammed full; (it was admitted that the car in question was a so called `snake car') that when nearing the first stop, she got up and tried to get Dear the door and with hard struggling and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Jordan v. St. Louis Public Service Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • April 6, 1937
    ...Co., 236 Mass. 234; Ritchie v. Boston Elevated Ry. Co., 238 Mass. 473; Burns v. Boston Elevated Ry. Co., 244 Mass. 451; Rogers v. Boston Elevated Ry. Co., 246 Mass. 478; Lehrberger v. Public Service Co., 79 N.J. L. 134; R. C. L. 1141. (2) The court erred in submitting the question of liabil......
  • Jordan v. St. Louis Pub. Serv. Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • April 6, 1937
    ...Co., 236 Mass. 234; Ritchie v. Boston Elevated Ry. Co., 238 Mass. 473; Burns v. Boston Elevated Ry. Co., 244 Mass. 451; Rogers v. Boston Elevated Ry. Co., 246 Mass. 478; Lehrberger v. Public Service Co., 79 N.J.L. 134; 4 R.C.L. 1141. (2) The court erred in submitting the question of liabili......
  • Dullea v. Boston Elevated Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • January 28, 1925
    ...Mass. 473, 131 N. E. 67, and cases cited; Sack v. Director General of Railroads, 245 Mass. 114, 139 N. E. 819;Rogerse v. Boston Elevated Railway, 246 Mass. 478, 141 N. E. 285. In Kuhlen v. Boston & Northern Street Railway, 193 Mass. 341, 79 N. E. 815,7 L. R. A. (N. S.) 729, 118 Am. St. Rep.......
  • Dullea v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • January 28, 1925
    ... ... and violent in their attempt to board the car, and that the ... passenger was injured by this conduct, did not impose ... liability upon the defendant. Ritchie v. Boston Elevated ... Railway, 238 Mass. 473 , and cases cited. Sack v ... Director General of Railroads, 245 Mass. 114 ... Rogers ... [251 Mass. 59] ... v. Boston Elevated Railway, 246 Mass. 478 ... In Kuhlen v ... Boston & Northern Street Railway, 193 Mass. 341 , ... Morse v. Newton Street Railway, 213 Mass. 595, ... Franz v. Holyoke Street Railway, 239 Mass. 565 , the ... carrier was held liable for the passenger's ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT