Rogers v. Galveston City R. Co.
Decision Date | 18 March 1890 |
Citation | 13 S.W. 540 |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Parties | ROGERS <I>v.</I> GALVESTON CITY R. CO. |
S. S. Hansom and F. M. Spencer, for appellant. James B. & Charles J. Stubbs, for appellee.
The platform of the streetcar on which appellant, the plaintiff below, was a driver at the time of the injury becoming worn by the feet of the drivers continually standing thereon, it was repaired by two planks, which were nailed down on the floor. The platform at the front part is five feet across. Its general width is five feet and five inches. One of the planks nailed down in front, near the dash-board, is eleven inches wide and two feet long, and the other plank is nine inches wide and two feet five inches long. They touch each other, and are beveled down at the edges. One of them is not more than a half inch thick, and the other said to be five-eighths of an inch. The thinner one is in the rear. They do not extend all the way across the platform. Plaintiff testified that there was a small space between the boards, but the photograph sent up with the record does not show it. This patch is the defect complained of, which it is alleged caused the injury. The position of the driver was on the front board. Plaintiff said in his testimony: "If I stepped to the front or back of it, either my heel or toe would be the higher, and on account of the long hours it was very tiresome." Plaintiff's testimony gives an account of the occurrence as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hines v. Wicks
...1062, L. R. A. 1915C, 1, Ann. Cas. 1915B, 475; Railway Co. v. Bradford, 66 Tex. 732, 2 S. W. 595, 59 Am. Rep. 639; Rogers v. Galveston City Ry. Co., 76 Tex. 502, 13 S. W. 540; Railway Co. v. Brentford, 79 Tex. 619, 15 S. W. 561, 23 Am. St. Rep. 377; Railway Co. v. Bingle, 91 Tex. 287, 42 S.......
-
Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Cooper
...intelligence and prudence must necessarily be presumed to have learned of them in the ordinary course of his employment. Rogers v. Railway Co., 76 Tex. 502, 13 S. W. 540; Railway Co. v. Allen, supra; Bonnet v. Railway Co., 89 Tex. 72, 33 S. W. 334; Railway Co. v. Somers, 78 Tex. 439, 14 S. ......
-
Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. Butts
...Co., 108 Tex. 321, 192 S. W. 1060; Ry. v. Mathis, 101 Tex. 342, 107 S. W. 530; Ry. v. Hynson, 101 Tex. 543, 109 S. W. 929; Rogers v. Ry., 76 Tex. 503, 13 S. W. 540; Ry. v. Bradford, 66 Tex. 732, 2 S. W. 595, 59 Am. Rep. 639; Ry. v. McCarthy, 64 Tex. 632; Webb v. Ry., 27 Tex. Civ. App. 75, 6......
-
Ladonia Cotton Oil Co. v. Shaw
...Railway Co. v. McCarthy, 64 Tex. 632; Railway Co. v. French, 86 Tex. 96, 23 S. W. 642; Railway Co. v. Lempe, 59 Tex. 19; Rogers v. Railway Co., 76 Tex. 502, 13 S. W. 540; Green v. Cross, 79 Tex. 130, 15 S. W. 220; Railroad Co. v. Scott (Tex. Civ. App.) 62 S. W. 1077; Brown v. Miller (Tex. C......