Rogers v. Roberts
| Decision Date | 23 November 1891 |
| Citation | 13 S.E. 962,88 Ga. 150 |
| Parties | Rogers et al. v. Roberts, Judge. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Mandamus to Judge — Corrections in Bill of Exceptions.
After a judge has corrected, signed, and certified a bill of exceptions, having interlined in the certificate a reference to the corrections made by him, and the plaintiff in error has served and filed the bill of exceptions thus certified, and caused it, together with the record, to be transmitted to this court, thereby recognizing and adopting such bill of exceptions as sufficient, it is too late to apply to this court for a mandamus to compel the judge to omit the corrections he had made in the bill of exceptions as originally presented to him, and sign another certificate, free from such interlineation. (Syllabus by the Court.)
Application of J. S. Rogers and others for a writ of mandamus to D. M. Poberts, judge, to compel him to omit certain corrections in a bill of exceptions. Writ denied.
A. C. Pate and J. H. Martin, for movants.
Mandamus denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Scott v. Turner
...too late to apply to this court for a mandamus to compel the judge to certify further respecting such bill of excep-tions. Rogers v. Roberts, 88 Ga. 150, 13 S. E. 962. The above is true, although counsel for the plaintiff in error may, before receiving from the judge the certified bill of e......