Rogers v. Salt River Project Agr. Imp. and Power Dist., 11151
Decision Date | 11 January 1974 |
Docket Number | No. 11151,11151 |
Citation | 517 P.2d 1275,110 Ariz. 279 |
Parties | Richard G. ROGERS and Alice Fay Rogers, his wife, Valley National Bank of Arizona, Trustee, Western Farms Investment Company, and Willinger's Turf Grass Farms, Inc., Appellants, v. SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, Appellee. |
Court | Arizona Supreme Court |
Elmer C. Coker, Phoenix, for appellants Western Farms Investment Co. and Willinger's Turf Grass Farms, Inc.
Streich, Lang, Weeks, Cardon & French by William P. French, Phoenix, for appellants Rogers.
Fennemore, Craig, von Ammon & Udall by Calvin H. Udall, Phoenix, for appellant Valley Nat. Bank.
Jennings, Strouss & Salmon by Jon L. Kyl, Phoenix, for appellee.
This is an appeal by the defendant landowners Richard G. and Alice Fay Rogers, Valley National Bank, Western Farms Investment Co., and Willinger's Turf Grass Farms, Inc., from orders of the Superior Court of Maricopa County granting the plaintiff Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District immediate possession of certain tracts of land pursuant to § 12--1116 et seq., A.R.S.
From an order of immediate possession, defendants first filed a petition for special action in this court. After an informal hearing on 21 November 1972, we declined to accept jurisdiction and suggested to the parties an appeal would be a more appropriate method of review. On 24 November 1972, the defendants filed notice of appeal to the Court of Appeals. The appeal was thereafter transferred to this court on petition of the parties pursuant to Rule 47(e)(1), Rules of the Supreme Court, 17A A.R.S.
We need consider only one question and that is whether the appeal itself is premature.
Early in the history of this court we held that '(an) order of immediate possession * * * (is) unquestionably not directly appealable.' De Hansen v. District Court, 11 Ariz. 379, 383, 94 P. 1125, 1126 (1908). And our Court of Appeals has stated:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Holt v. Western Farm Services, Inc.
... ... O'Harrow v. Salmon River etc. Co., 84 Idaho 427, 373 P.2d 336 (1962); ... ...
-
Cook v. Cook
...must await final judgment. The holding in Cordova was approved by our Supreme Court in Rogers v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power Dist., 110 Ariz. 279, 517 P.2d 1275 (1974), a case similarly holding on general condemnation law principles that a condemnation order is not a......
- State v. Whittingham, 2680-PR