Rogers v. Toccoa Electric Power Co, (No. 5460.)

Decision Date05 March 1927
Docket Number(No. 5460.)
Citation163 Ga. 919,137 S.E. 272
PartiesROGERS et al. v. TOCCOA ELECTRIC POWER CO.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

(Syllabus by Editorial Staff.)

Error from Superior Court, Fannin County; M. C. Tarver, Judge.

Suit by W. E. Rogers and others against the Toccoa Electric Power Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs bring error. Affirmed.

See, also, 161 Ga. 524, 131 S. E. 517, 44 A. L. R. 534.

Watkins & Asbill, of Atlanta, T. H. Crawford and Thos. A. Brown, both of Blue Ridge, and Morris, Hawkins & Wallace, of Marietta, for plaintiffs in error.

Maddox, Matthews & Owens, of Rome, and Wm. Butt, of Blue Ridge, for defendant in error.

Syllabus Opinion by the Court.

ATKINSON, J. [1] 1. Civil Code 1910, § 2823, par. 1, relating to the power of the superior courts to create corporations, provides:

"The persons desiring the charter shall file, in the office of the clerk of the superior court of the county in which they desire to transact business, a petition or declaration, specifying the object of their association, and the particular business they propose to carry on, together with their corporate name, and the amount of capital to be employed by them actually paid in, and their place of doing business, and the time, not exceeding twenty years, for which they desire to be incorporated; which petition or declaration shall be published once a week for four weeks in the nearest publicgazette to the point where such business is located, before said court shall pass an order declaring said application granted."

Certain petitioners for charter of a corporation under this law alleged that they desired to be incorporated "for a period of thirty (30) years." The petition was published in the manner and for the time provided by law, after which the court allowed an amendment to the petition striking "thirty (30)" and inserting in lieu thereof "twenty (20)." With the petition thus amended, the court issued an order purporting to charter the corporation for a term of 20 years. Held, that, the order of incorporation was not void on the ground that it was not based upon an application that had been published as required by law. Redwine v. Gate City Loan & Building Ass'n, 54 Ga. 474; Van Pelt v. Home Building & Loan Ass'n, 79 Ga. 439 (2), 4 S. E. 501.

2. The defendant, Toccoa Electric Power Company, is a successor in title to Toccoa Power Company. The latter company inaugurated the construction of a dam as a part of a hydroelectric plant, and instituted proceedings to condemn certain lands that would be submerged by the backwaters from the dam. The persons who are plaintiffs in the present action instituted suit to enjoin said condemnation proceedings. The case came to this court; and it was held that the charter of that company was void, and that the company could not exercise the power of eminent domain. 161 Ga. 524, 131 S. E. 517, 44 A. L. R. 534. After that decision the trial court permanently enjoined the Toccoa Power Company as prayed. Shortly afterward a majority of the officers and directors of the company proceeded to organize the Toccoa Electric Power Company under a different charter, and the latter company took over the properties, contracts, liabilities, and work of the Toccoa Power Company, and proposed to exercise the power of eminent domain. Held, that the defendant as a corporation is not bound by the judgment in the former case. Bradley v. Lithonia & A. M. R. Co., 147 Ga. 22 (1), 92 S. E. 539.

3. The petitioners for charter of the Toccoa Electric Power Company, except one, were nonresidents of this state. This fact of nonresidence will not give character to the corporation, thereby making it a foreign corporation.

4. The authorized capital stock was $100,000, divided into 1, 000 shares. When the stock was issued, the Tennessee Electric Power Company, a foreign corporation that was financing the enterprise, became owner of 995 shares of the capital stock. Officers of the latter company, except one, were the petitioners for charter of the Toccoa Electric Power Company, and constituted its first board of directors and corporate officials. The business of the corporation, as declared in the petition for charter, was "to acquire, erect, maintain, and operate works, plants, and transmission lines, for generating and supplying electricity to the public for light, heat, and power, and for the purpose of supplying electricity for lighting towns and cities and supplying motive power to railways, street and electric railways, manufacturing plants, and any and all other users of electricity." A resolution of the board of directors, authorizing construction of the dam, declared the purpose of the corporation to be "generating electricity by water power to be used for the purpose of lighting towns and cities, and * * * supplying motive power to railroads and street car lines, and * * * supplying light, heat, and power to the public, as provided by and in accordance with the laws of the state of Georgia." The location of the dam was in a sparsely settled mountainous section of Fannin county, Ga., near the line of Tennessee. There were no nearby cities in the state of Georgia; the only nearby towns in this state being Blue Ridge, McCaysville, and Morganton. The Toccoa river flows out of Georgia into Tennessee, and becomes Ocoee river after entering the latter state. The contemplated dam will be 170 feet high, and will cause backwater in Georgia for a distance exceeding 11 miles, submerging improved and unimproved lands of other proprietors along the river and a section of the principal state highway, including the bridge on that highway. The anticipated horse power is 22, 000. The estimated electric power that would be produced is about 35, 000, 000 kilowatt hours annually.

The towns of Blue Ridge and McCaysville would consume about 25, 000 kilowatt hours annually, if they should become users of the power. If there should be a demand for more power in Georgia by the establishment of manufactories or for other cause, the company would supply it; but the present intention is to deliver, by means of power lines now being constructed, the whole power not used in Georgia to the Tennessee Electric Power Company by "feeding" it into a transmission system of that company at the state line. The latter company has its offices in the state of Tennessee, and numerous electric plants, some operated by water and some by steam, and by its transmission system supplies numerous cities and towns in Tennessee, and elsewhere with electric power. Included among its patrons are the Georgia Electric Power Company, a public service corporation of this state, and the town of McCaysville in this state. Held:

(a) The Toccoa Electric Power Company has, by virtue of the provisions of the general law (Civil Code of 1910, § 5240), authority to exercise the power of eminent domain for the purpose of acquiring, under statutory proceedings, land that would be submerged by the backwaters from the dam. Nolan v. Central Georgia Power Co., 134 Ga. 201 (4), 67 S. E. 656; Jones v. North. Georgia Electric Co., 125 Ga. 618, 54 S. E. 85, 6 L. R. A. (N. S.) 122, 5 Ann. Cas. 526.

(b) Whether a purpose is a public or private purpose within the meaning of the law relating...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Augusta Power Co. v. Savannah River Electric Co.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • November 26, 1930
    ... ... SAVANNAH RIVER ELECTRIC COMPANY, Respondent. No". 12034. Supreme Court of South Carolina November 26, 1930 ...      \xC2" ... 557, 79 ... S.E. 3, 46 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1073 and note; Rogers" v ... Toccoa Electric Power Co., 163 Ga. 919, 137 S.E. 272 ...    \xC2" ... ...
  • Norton Realty & Loan Co., Inc. v. Board of Ed. of Hall County
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • September 18, 1973
    ...principle has been followed in Bradley v. Lithonia & Arabia Mountain Railway Co., 147 Ga. 22(2), 92 S.E. 539; Rogers v. Toccoa Electric Power Co., 163 Ga. 919(4b), 137 S.E. 272; Housing Authority etc. v. Johnson, 209 Ga. 560, 562, 74 S.E.2d 891; Hightower v. Chattahoochee Industrial Railroa......
  • Austin Enterprises, Inc. v. DeKalb County
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • May 27, 1966
    ...124-125, 126 S.E.2d 664, 666; Harrold Bros. v. Mayor & etc. of Americus, 142 Ga. 686(1), 688, 83 S.E. 534; Rogers v. Toccoa Electric Power Co., 163 Ga. 919 (4b), 137 S.E. 272. As pointed out in a railroad condemnation case, '(t)he fact that the track may be for the present benefit of only o......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT