Rolfe v. Atkinson
| Decision Date | 04 April 1927 |
| Citation | 156 N.E. 51,259 Mass. 76 |
| Parties | ROLFE v. ATKINSON. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from Superior Court, Essex County; Lourie, Judge.
Bill by Henry P. Rolfe against Walter E. Atkinson for division of personal property. From a decree dismissing the bill, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
E. E. Crawshaw, of Newburyport, for appellant.
D. J. Cohen, of Boston, for appellee.
Moses H. Rolfe died intestate on April 18, 1907. His sole surviving heirs at law are his children, Mary A. Rolfe and the plaintiff, and they were appointed administrators of his estate. In an inventory filed by them a grain elevator and its fixtures were listed as a part of the personal estate. No account has been filed or decree for distribution entered in the probate court; and no proceedings therein appear since the filing of the inventory. The bill alleges that the plaintiff and the defendant are equal owners as tenants in common of the elevator and fixtures; and prays that a commissioner be appointed and empowered to make a sale of the property, that an accounting be had, and that a decree be entered that one half the amount realized from the sale be paid to the plaintiff. Although the elevator stands on land held by the defendant under a lease, it is assumed by the parties to be personal property.
After the death of the intestate, Mary A. Rolfe, as administrator, continued to carry on the grain business previously conducted by her father in the name of the estate, with the knowledge of the plaintiff, who made no objection thereto. She used the elevator and fixtures in connection with said business until March 27, 1925, when she made an assignment to one Arnold for the benefit of her creditors. The interest in the property so assigned was sold by Arnold to the defendant. It need not be determined whether G. L. c. 214, § 3, is applicable to a division or sale of personal property owned by tenants in common, as we are satisfied for the reasons hereinafter stated, that the bill cannot be maintained.
[1][2] It is manifest that, upon the reported evidence and the findings of fact, the order dismissing the bill without prejudice was not erroneous. Mary A. Rolfe, as administrator, carried on the business until March, 1925. with the knowledge and assent of her brother, the coadministrator, and as no account has been filed and no distribution of the estate made, it could be found that the estate is still pending in the probate court. The settlement of an estate of a deceased person is under the exclusive jurisdiction of the probate court, and title to the personal property of such person from the time of his death vests in his administrator or executor; respecting the administration of such estates a court of equity will not act. Lawrence v. Wright, 23 Pick. 128; Greene v. Brown, 180 Mass. 308, 62 N. E. 374;Fletcher v. Fletcher, 191 Mass. 211, 77 N. E. 758;Welch v. Boston, 211 Mass. 178, 97 N. E. 893;S. S. Pierce Co. v. Fiske, 237 Mass. 39, 129 N. E. 609.
[3] As the property in question belonged to the estate of the deceased and was dealt with as such from the date of his death until March, 1925, a finding was warranted that title...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Wasserman v. Tonelli
...that admissions of fact, contrary to the true fact, which would have the effect of depriving a court of jurisdiction (Rolfe v. Atkinson, 259 Mass. 76, 78, 156 N.E. 51), or of importing jurisdiction to a tribunal (Singer Sewing Mach. Co. v. Assessors of Boston, 341 Mass. 513, 517, 170 N.E.2d......
-
Marks v. Scalabrini
...v. Schumm , 290 Mass. 159, 163, 194 N.E. 895 (1935) ; Lowell v. Hudson , 268 Mass. 574, 577, 168 N.E. 87 (1929) ; Rolfe v. Atkinson , 259 Mass. 76, 78, 156 N.E. 51 (1927) ). If Dr. Marks owned the Intellectual Property at the time of his death, the parties agree, it would be an asset of the......
-
Blake v. Blake, 7382
... ... relates back to the death of the former owner. Lawrence ... v. Wright, 23 Pick. 128; Rolfe v. Atkinson, 259 ... Mass. 76, 77, 156 N.E. 51; Stuck v. Schumm, 290 ... Mass. 159, 163, 194 N.E. 895. The interest of the next of kin ... in his ... ...
-
Hobbs v. Cunningham
...property owned by one who died intestate vests in the administrator of his estate. Lawrence v. Wright, 23 Pick. 128; Rolfe v. Atkinson, 259 Mass. 76, 156 N. E. 51, and cases cited. When an administrator is appointed, the appointment relates back and the personal property vests in him from t......