Roman v. 1185 Ave. of the Americas Associates
Decision Date | 01 May 1997 |
Citation | 656 N.Y.S.2d 630,239 A.D.2d 101 |
Parties | Victor ROMAN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. 1185 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS ASSOCIATES, etc., et al., Defendants-Appellants, and A.J. Contracting Co., Incorporated, et al., Defendants. . |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Thomas G. Cascione, for Plaintiff-Respondent.
Carol R. Finocchio, William A. Fitzgerald, for Defendants-Appellants.
Before MURPHY, P.J., and ROSENBERGER, ELLERIN and WALLACH, JJ.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered May 20, 1996, which granted plaintiff's motion for leave to amend his bill of particulars to allege additional injuries, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
This action, which was commenced on August 30, 1989, arises from injuries allegedly suffered by plaintiff when he slipped on loose construction materials at a job site on March 27, 1987. Among the injuries alleged in his original bill of particulars were traumatic degenerative arthritis of the left hip joint and torn muscles of the left hip.
On March 11, 1994, plaintiff's attorneys filed a note of issue and a certificate of readiness, but defendants moved to strike to obtain discovery on hip replacement surgeries which had been undergone by plaintiff in 1992 and 1994. On April 6, 1994, counsel for the parties entered into the following stipulation:
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for plaintiff, Victor Roman, and the attorneys for defendant, A.J. CONTRACTING CO., that, as of the date hereof, plaintiff has not alleged that plaintiff's hip replacement surgeries are causally related to the events, which allegedly gave rise to plaintiff's injury on March 27, 1987.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that should plaintiff allege, subsequent to the date hereof, that plaintiff's hip replacement surgeries are causally related to the events, which allegedly gave rise to plaintiff's injury of March 27, 1987, defendant, A.J. CONTRACTING CO. will be entitled to a further examination before trial and a further independent medical examination, despite the filing of plaintiff's Note of Issue, dated March 11, 1994.
On June 27, 1994, the IAS court issued an order denying defendants' motion to strike.
On January 17, 1996 plaintiff moved to amend his bill of particulars or to reargue the June 27, 1994 order to add the bilateral hip replacement surgeries that he had undergone as further injuries...
To continue reading
Request your trial