Romano v. Leger
| Decision Date | 27 April 2010 |
| Parties | Michael ROMANO, Jr., respondent, v. Stanley LEGER, et al., defendants, Dorothy Siniscalchi, appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Hammill, O'Brien, Croutier, Dempsey, Pender & Koehler, P.C., Syosset, N.Y. (Anton Piotroski of counsel), for appellant.
Gruenberg & Kelly, P.C., Ronkonkoma, N.Y. (John Aviles of counsel), for respondent.
PETER B. SKELOS, J.P., FRED T. SANTUCCI, PLUMMER E. LOTT, and SANDRA L. SGROI, JJ.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Dorothy Siniscalchi appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Galasso, J.), entered June 15, 2009, which denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against her.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion of the defendant Dorothy Siniscalchi for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against her is granted.
The plaintiff allegedly was injured when he tripped and fell on an alleged defect in a sidewalk located on land owned by the Village of Lynbrook. The section of the sidewalk where the plaintiff allegedly tripped and fell abutted property owned by the defendant Dorothy Siniscalchi, and the parties do not dispute that the alleged defect was created by the growth of the roots of a tree located on Siniscalchi's property.
An abutting landowner will be liable to a pedestrian injured by a defect in a public sidewalk only when the owner either created the condition or caused the defect to occur because of a special use, or when a statute or ordinance places an obligation to maintain the sidewalk on the owner and expressly makes the owner liable for injuries caused by a breach of that duty ( see Simmons v. Guthrie, 304 A.D.2d 819, 757 N.Y.S.2d 873; Meyer v. Guinta, 262 A.D.2d 463, 692 N.Y.S.2d 159; Winberry v. City of New York, 257 A.D.2d 618, 684 N.Y.S.2d 290).
In support of her motion for summary judgment, Siniscalchi established that she did not breach a statutory duty to maintain the sidewalk, she did not affirmatively create the condition which allegedly caused the plaintiff to fall, and she made no special use of the sidewalk where the plaintiff allegedly fell ( see Picone v. Schlaich, 245 A.D.2d 555, 667 N.Y.S.2d 57). Even if the growth of the underground roots of the tree on her property undermined the sidewalk on the land abutting her property, under these circumstances, she is...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Christian v. United States
...669 N.E.2d 470 (1996); Petrillo v. Town of Hempstead, 85 A.D.3d 996, 997, 925 N.Y.S.2d 660 (2d Dep't 2011); Romano v. Leger, 72 A.D.3d 1059, 900 N.Y.S.2d 346 (2d Dep't 2010). “[L]iability for injuries sustained as a result of negligent maintenance of or the existence of dangerous and defect......
-
Lewis v. Palazzolo
...LLC, 111 A.D.3d 698, 698, 974 N.Y.S.2d 796 ; see O'Toole v. City of Yonkers, 107 A.D.3d 866, 867, 967 N.Y.S.2d 751 ; Romano v. Leger, 72 A.D.3d 1059, 1059, 900 N.Y.S.2d 346 ). “In order for a statute, ordinance or municipal charter to impose tort liability upon an abutting owner for injurie......
-
Brown v. City of N.Y.
...New York , 114 A.D.3d 734, 735, 980 N.Y.S.2d 482 ; see Missirlakis v. McCarthy , 145 A.D.3d at 773, 44 N.Y.S.3d 89; Romano v. Leger , 72 A.D.3d 1059, 1059, 900 N.Y.S.2d 346 ). The Holleys established that they did not create the defective condition that allegedly caused the plaintiff's fall......
-
Bosch v. Inc. Vill. of Island Park
...LLC, 111 A.D.3d 698, 698, 974 N.Y.S.2d 796; see O'Toole v. City of Yonkers, 107 A.D.3d 866, 867, 967 N.Y.S.2d 751; Romano v. Leger, 72 A.D.3d 1059, 1059, 900 N.Y.S.2d 346)". Lewis v. Palazzolo, 143 A.D.3d 783 (2d. Dept. 2016). " Liability may only be imposed on the abutting owner or lessee ......