Rood v. Newberg, 110599
Decision Date | 05 November 1999 |
Docket Number | No. 96-P-1479,96-P-1479 |
Citation | 718 N.E.2d 886,48 Mass. App. Ct. 185 |
Parties | (Mass.App.Ct. 1999) SHEA L. ROOD vs. MICHAEL NEWBERG (and a companion case <A HREF="#fr1-1" name="fn1-1">1 ) |
Court | Appeals Court of Massachusetts |
Essex County
Probate Court, Findings by judge, Attorney's fees. Undue Influence. Fraud. Will, Allowance,
Undue influence. Damages, Interest.
Civil action commenced in the Essex Division of the Probate and Family Court Department on
November 22, 1994.
The cases were consolidated and heard by Edward J. Rockett, J.
Marvin R. Finn for Shea L. Rood.
Barry Ravech for Michael Newberg & another.
the accounts were as follows:
1.Salem Five Cents Savings Bank
Dora Shaffer, trustee for Michael Newberg, with approximately $86,000 in a checking account;
2.Eastern Bank
Dora Shaffer or Michael Newberg, with approximately $52,000 in a savings account;
3.Marblehead Savings Bank
Dora Shaffer and Michael Newberg, with approximately $3,300 in a checking account;
4.Marblehead Savings Bank
Dora Shaffer and Michael Newberg, with approximately $57,000 in a savings account.
Rood filed a motion to amend the judge's findings of fact and conclusions of law to include a
conclusion that Estelle had conspired with Newberg to perpetrate a fraud and/or unduly influence
Shaffer in regard to the 1992 will. The judge denied the motion. The judge then allowed Rood's
request for counsel fees and costs in the amount of $58,143.12 and Estelle's and Newberg's
request for legal fees and costs amounting to $27,666.65.
Estelle and Newberg filed a motion to set aside, amend, or supplement the judge's findings or for
a new trial, in both the equity and estate actions. The judge denied the motion. Over Newberg's
objection, the judge allowed Rood's motion to amend the judgment in the equity matter, seeking
interest at the twelve percent statutory rate on the four bank accounts.
Newberg appealed from the decisions entered in the equity and estate matters. Rood, in turn,
appealed from the "judgment," as he understood it, that the attorney's fees and costs incurred by
Newberg and Estelle should be paid from the residue of the estate. Rood also claimed that Estelle
should be stripped of any benefits she received under the will because she acted in concert with
her son regarding the fraud and undue influence.
We summarize the judge's findings of fact, supplementing them with undisputed evidence,
including a statement of agreed facts submitted by the parties. At her death, Shaffer's gross estate
was $841,827. It included thirteen savings or certificate of deposit accounts in her own name
totaling $225,867, personal property valued at $14,104, twenty-one survivorship bank accounts
and certificates of deposit worth $471,256 and her interest in a home valued at $100,000.
Shaffer conveyed ownership of her home, at Rood's suggestion, to Newberg and herself jointly
with the right of survivorship because she was fearful that Newberg might marry and move out;
Newberg had lived with her since 1971 because Shaffer did not want to live alone.
In 1972, Shaffer and Rood opened a safe deposit box at the Security National Bank (Security
National). On numerous occasions, Shaffer told Rood that if she ever became seriously ill, he
was to take all of her bankbooks and jewelry from the box and place them in his own safe deposit
box so that the items would not become part of her estate and be taxed upon her death.
Sometime in 1989 or 1990, Rood, who was an industrial packaging salesman, became very busy
with his own business obligations and did not have the time to assist Shaffer with her various
errands. Therefore, Shaffer told Rood that Newberg would help her. She also told Rood that she
intended to make her checking account at Salem Five Cent Savings Bank a joint account with
Newberg for her convenience. On December 21, 1989, Shaffer changed the Salem account to
read in her name as "Trustee for Michael Newberg."
On January 28, 1991, Shaffer went to Security National and removed the bankbooks and jewelry
from the safe deposit box that she shared with Rood and took those items to her home. On
January 30, 1991, Newberg opened a safe deposit box at the Shore Bank in his name and put the
bank books and jewelry in that box. On January 31, 1991, Shaffer opened a second safe deposit
box at the same bank, and, on February 1, she had the box also placed in Rood's name. She
closed this box on May 11, 1992.
Rood visited Shaffer in the hospital. He told her that he had gone to the safe deposit box and
discovered that all of the bankbooks and jewelry were missing. Shaffer had forgotten her
instructions to Rood. She also did not remember that she had removed the items herself.
Therefore, upon being told that they were missing, Shaffer became extremely agitated and
demanded to know why Rood had gone to the safe deposit box. Fearful of aggravating her
medical condition, Rood left the room without answering her question.
After he left, Rood told Newberg about the missing bankbooks and jewelry and about his
mother's reaction. Newberg told him not to worry because the items were at Shaffer's home in
her dresser drawer. Newberg knew that the items were actually in his safe deposit box.
On several occasions between the time that Shaffer returned home from the hospital until her
death, she complained to Newberg about Rood taking the items from her safe deposit box and
that she did not trust him. Newberg did not remind her that she, not Rood, had removed the items
or that he, Newberg, had placed them in his own safe deposit box.
On June 18, 1991, Shaffer changed her checking account at the Marblehead Savings Bank
(Marblehead Savings) to a joint account in her and Newberg's names. She also opened a savings
account at the same bank on July 22, 1991, in those names. On April 30, 1992, Shaffer opened
yet another savings account in the same names at Eastern Bank. The judge found that these three
accounts were made joint accounts because of fraud and undue influence of Newberg.
On October 16, 1992, Newberg drove Shaffer to her attorney's office where she informed the
lawyer that she wanted to change her will. Newberg was present both when Shaffer discussed the
provisions she wanted and when she told her lawyer that one of the reasons she was changing the
will concerned Rood's removing her property from the safe deposit box without her permission.
Newberg gave the lawyer a list of bankbooks and dispositive provisions that he had prepared.
On October 23, 1992, Newberg again drove Shaffer to her lawyer's office. The will was then
executed in Newberg's presence. Shaffer told one of the witnesses to the will that she was
changing her will because Rood had taken items from her safe deposit box and she had a difficult
time getting them back. Newberg heard the statement but did not respond or otherwise correct
her. In addition, Shaffer gave a durable power of attorney to Newberg that day.
The judge found as a fact that Shaffer was opinionated, feisty, stubborn, and...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Howe v. Bank for Intern. Settlements
...Cir.2000) (quoting Barrett Assocs., Inc. v. Aronson, 346 Mass. 150, 152, 190 N.E.2d 867, 868 (1963)); accord Rood v. Newberg, 48 Mass.App.Ct. 185, 192, 718 N.E.2d 886, 892 (1999), review denied, 431 Mass. 1106, 733 N.E.2d 126 Just as Howe could not establish reliance or causation for his Ru......
-
In re Porter, 10–1130.
...Inc., 446 Mass. 245, 843 N.E.2d 1058, 1064 (2006). 320.Karal v. Marken, 333 Mass. 743, 133 N.E.2d 476 (1956); Rood v. Newberg, 48 Mass.App.Ct. 185, 718 N.E.2d 886 (1999), rev. denied, 431 Mass. 1106, 733 N.E.2d 126 (2000). 321.Collins v. Huculak, 57 Mass.App.Ct. 387, 783 N.E.2d 834 (2003). ......
-
Lacey v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP (In re Lacey)
...Aronson, 346 Mass. 150, 190 N.E.2d 867, 868 (1963); Kilroy v. Barron, 326 Mass. 464, 95 N.E.2d 190, 191 (1950); Rood v. Newberg, 48 Mass.App.Ct. 185, 718 N.E.2d 886, 892 (1999); accord Borden v. Paul Revere Life Ins. Co., 935 F.2d 370, 379 (1st Cir.1991). But other deceit cases say "plainti......
-
Lacey v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP (In re Lacey)
...Aronson, 346 Mass. 150, 190 N.E.2d 867, 868 (1963); Kilroy v. Barron, 326 Mass. 464, 95 N.E.2d 190, 191 (1950); Rood v. Newberg, 48 Mass.App.Ct. 185, 718 N.E.2d 886, 892 (1999); accord Borden v. Paul Revere Life Ins. Co., 935 F.2d 370, 379 (1st Cir.1991). But other deceit cases say “plainti......