Root v. Childs
Citation | 68 Minn. 142,70 N.W. 1087 |
Parties | ROOT v CHILDS ET AL. |
Decision Date | 06 May 1897 |
Court | Minnesota Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
(Syllabus by the Court.)
1. Where the obligation of a party to a contract is to pay only upon the happening of a contingency, its occurrence must be alleged in the complaint in an action for the recovery of the money. But, if payment is not to be made if a certain contingency happens, it is not necessary to allege in the complaint the nonhappening of the contingency.
2. Held, that the complaint herein complies with this rule, and that it states a cause of action.
Appeal from district court, Hennepin county; Seagrave Smith, Judge.
Action by Albert A. Root against Clarence H. Childs and others. From an order overruling a demurrer to the complaint, defendants appeal. Affirmed.
C. H. Childs, J. D. Shearer, and C. J. Cahaley, for appellants.
Dickinson & Lum, for respondent.
Appeal by defendants from an order overruling their general demurrer to the complaint. The plaintiff declared upon a written contract (Exhibit A) executed by the parties hereto, which was made a part of the complaint. The contract in which the plaintiff is the party of the first part and the defendants are the parties of the second part recites that the plaintiff has acquired certain rights in and under certain letters patent of the United States (No. 521,990), covering a certain advertising device, which were conveyed to him by William P. Goodspeed by an instrument dated October 16, 1895. Then follow the covenants of the parties, which, so far as here material, are these: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
The National Surety Co. v. W. H. Holliday Co.
... ... N.W. 327; Benware v. Town of Pine Valley, 10 N.W ... 695; Milburn v. Co., 34 S.E. 848; Ary v ... Chesmore, 84 N.W. 965; Root v. Childs, et al., ... 70 N.W. 1087; Albers v. Co., 66 N.W. 1040; ... McGlauflin v. Warmser, 72 P. 428. The petition shows ... on its face that ... ...
-
Floyd v. Pugh
... ... State, 92 Ala. 86, 88, 9 So. 399; Flouss & Kennedy ... v. Eureka Co., 80 Ala. 30; Vincent v. Rogers, ... 30 Ala. 471 ... In ... Root v. Childs, 68 Minn. 142, 146, 70 N.W. 1087, ... 1088, the court said: ... "Where the obligation of a party to a contract is to pay ... only upon ... ...
-
Thatcher v. Darr
... ... happenings of a contingency, its occurrence must be alleged ... in an action for recovery. ( Root v. Childs, 70 N.W ... 1087; Briggs v. Rutherford, 101 N.W. 954; Wilson ... v. Clark, 20 Minn. 367; Husenetter v ... Gullikson, 75 N.W ... ...
- American Trust & Savings Bank v. Gluck