Rosaler v. Rosaler, s. 82-2684
| Decision Date | 29 November 1983 |
| Docket Number | 82-2685,Nos. 82-2684,s. 82-2684 |
| Citation | 442 So.2d 1018 |
| Parties | Joseph H. ROSALER, Appellant, v. Iris Kanter ROSALER, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Buchbinder & Elegant and Harris J. Buchbinder, Miami, for appellant.
Adkins & Hardy, Coral Gables, and Brooks C. Miller, South Miami, for appellee.
Before HENDRY, HUBBART and JORGENSON, JJ.
This is a consolidated appeal from an order awarding attorneys' fees and costs to the wife in an action for dissolution of marriage.
The husband seeks reversal on the grounds that the trial court erred by depriving him of the right to review the diary of the wife's attorney and in limiting the cross-examination of her attorney pertaining to work performed.
We have considered appellant's points and found them to be without merit.
The trial court has wide discretion in its treatment of requests for discovery and the court's ruling will not be disturbed unless an abuse of that discretion has been shown. No abuse of discretion has been made to appear in this case. Accordingly, the trial court's ruling is affirmed. Stowe v. Shults, 379 So.2d 682 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); Abelson v. Bosem, 329 So.2d 330 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), cert. denied, 341 So.2d 289 (Fla.1976); Crystal Springs Water Co. v. Atchison, 267 So.2d 694 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972).
Appellant's next contention is that the trial court erred in limiting the cross-examination of appellee's attorney at the hearing on the motion for attorneys' fees and costs. We find no merit in this contention.
No reversible error having been demonstrated, the order appealed is affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Rojas v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., 92-2234
...protecting the parties that come before it. American Southern Co. v. Tinter, Inc., 565 So.2d 891 (Fla.3d DCA 1990); Rosaler v. Rosaler, 442 So.2d 1018 (Fla.3d DCA 1983), rev. denied, 451 So.2d 850 (Fla.1984). The order entered here accomplishes the discovery of the sought after medical reco......
-
Hessley v. Travelers Indem. Co.
...See Buchman v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad, 381 So.2d 229 (Fla.1980); Perper v. Edell, 44 So.2d 78 (Fla.1949); Rosaler v. Rosaler, 442 So.2d 1018 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), pet. for review denied, 451 So.2d 850 (Fla.1984); Reliable Services, Inc. v. Taft, 247 So.2d 97 (Fla. 3d DCA In view of our ......
-
Waterfront Developers, Inc. v. City of Miami Beach
...has also urged error in certain protective orders. We find no abuse of discretion in the entry of the first instance, Rosaler v. Rosaler, 442 So.2d 1018 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Atrio v. Consolidated Industries, Inc. v. Southeast Bank, 434 So.2d 349 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Abelson v. Bosem, 329 So.2......
-
American Southern Co. v. Tinter, Inc., 90-1072
...wide discretion in its treatment of requests for discovery is shown, the court's ruling will not be disturbed. Rosaler v. Rosaler, 442 So.2d 1018 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). The Florida Supreme Court specifically addressed the propriety of certiorari review for discovery orders in Martin-Johnson, I......