Rose v. City of Rocky Mount
| Decision Date | 08 March 2007 |
| Docket Number | No. 17P07.,17P07. |
| Citation | 644 S.E.2d 232 |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | Sandra ROSE, Employee, Plaintiff v. CITY OF ROCKY MOUNT, Self-Insured Employer, Compensation Claims Solutions, Administrator, Defendants. |
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th day of January 2007 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th day of March 2007."
To continue reading
Request your trial
13 cases
-
Gore v. Myrtle/Mueller, 396PA06.
...as appellate fact finders. Rose v. City of Rocky Mt., 180 N.C.App. 392, 399, 637 S.E.2d 251, 256 (2006), disc. rev. denied, 361 N.C. 356, 644 S.E.2d 232 (2007). Since we have previously analyzed the factual and procedural background of plaintiff's claim, the only outstanding issue is whethe......
-
Johnson v. Thomasville Furniture Company, No. COA08-610 (N.C. App. 2/17/2009)
...of Rocky Mount, 180 N.C. App. 392, 400, 637 S.E.2d 251, 256 (2006) (internal quotation marks omitted), disc. review denied, 361 N.C. 356, 644 S.E.2d 232 (2007), and that our "duty goes no further than to determine whether the record contains any evidence tending to support the [challenged] ......
-
Morgan v. Morgan Motor Co. of Albemarle, Emp'r, & Brentwood Servs., Inc.
...might rationally justify reaching a different conclusion.”) (citation and quotation marks omitted), disc. review denied,361 N.C. 356, 644 S.E.2d 232 (2007).II. Findings of Fact 23 and 27 In addition to those findings of the Commission addressed in his primary argument on appeal, Plaintiff a......
-
Turner v. Custom Retail Services, Inc., No. COA08-300 (N.C. App. 12/2/2008), COA08-300
...180 N.C. App. 392, 400, 637 S.E.2d 251, 256 (2006) (emphasis added) (internal quotation marks omitted), disc. review denied, 361 N.C. 356, 644 S.E.2d 232 (2007), and that our "duty goes no further than to determine whether the record contains any evidence tending to support the [challenged]......
Request a trial to view additional results