Rose v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co., No. 25140.
| Court | United States State Supreme Court of Missouri |
| Writing for the Court | Atwood |
| Citation | 289 S.W. 913 |
| Docket Number | No. 25140. |
| Decision Date | 15 November 1926 |
| Parties | ROSE v. ST. LOUIS-SAN FRANCISCO RY. CO. |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
20 practice notes
-
Davis v. Stamper Co., No. 37204.
...a remittitur should be required. Cole v. Uhlmann Grain Co., 344 Mo. 277, 100 S.W. (2d) 311; Rose v. St. L.-S.F. Ry. Co., 315 Mo. 1181, 289 S.W. 913; Henry v. Ill. Central Ry. Co., 282 S.W. 423; Wolfe v. Payne, 294 Mo. 170, 241 S.W. 915; Young v. Lusk, 268 Mo. 625, 187 S.W. 849; Rodney v. St......
-
Boillot v. Income Guar. Co., No. 19139.
...repeal or counteract this evidence offered by the respondent to maintain his case. 64 C.J. 152; Rose v. St. Louis-San Francisco R. Co., 289 S.W. 913, 315 Mo. 1181; Hite v. St. Joseph & G.I.R. Co., 225 S.W. 916; Seibel-Suessdorf Cooper & Iron Mfg. Co. v. Manufacturer's Ry. Co., 130 S.W. 288,......
-
Dorman v. East St. Louis Ry. Co., No. 31503.
...807, 305 Mo. 260; Stolze v. Transit Co., 188 Mo. 581, 87 S.W. 517; Davenport v. Electric Co., 242 Mo. 111, 145 S.W. 454; Rose v. Ry. Co., 289 S.W. 913, 315 Mo. 1181; Crockett v. Rys. Co., 243 S.W. 902; Campbell v. United Rys., 243 Mo. 141, 147 S.W. 788. Louis E. Miller for respondent. (1) T......
-
Taylor v. Lumaghi Coal Co., No. 38756.
...Sup.), 253 S.W. 1023; Leighton v. Davis (Mo. 181 S.W.2d 541 Sup.), 260 S.W. 986; Rose v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co., 315 Mo. 1181, 289 S.W. 913; Cole v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co., 332 Mo. 999, 61 S.W. (2d) 344, judgments were reduced from larger amounts to between $10,000 to $12,......
Request a trial to view additional results
20 cases
-
Davis v. Stamper Co., No. 37204.
...a remittitur should be required. Cole v. Uhlmann Grain Co., 344 Mo. 277, 100 S.W. (2d) 311; Rose v. St. L.-S.F. Ry. Co., 315 Mo. 1181, 289 S.W. 913; Henry v. Ill. Central Ry. Co., 282 S.W. 423; Wolfe v. Payne, 294 Mo. 170, 241 S.W. 915; Young v. Lusk, 268 Mo. 625, 187 S.W. 849; Rodney v. St......
-
Boillot v. Income Guar. Co., No. 19139.
...repeal or counteract this evidence offered by the respondent to maintain his case. 64 C.J. 152; Rose v. St. Louis-San Francisco R. Co., 289 S.W. 913, 315 Mo. 1181; Hite v. St. Joseph & G.I.R. Co., 225 S.W. 916; Seibel-Suessdorf Cooper & Iron Mfg. Co. v. Manufacturer's Ry. Co., 130 S.W. 288,......
-
Dorman v. East St. Louis Ry. Co., No. 31503.
...807, 305 Mo. 260; Stolze v. Transit Co., 188 Mo. 581, 87 S.W. 517; Davenport v. Electric Co., 242 Mo. 111, 145 S.W. 454; Rose v. Ry. Co., 289 S.W. 913, 315 Mo. 1181; Crockett v. Rys. Co., 243 S.W. 902; Campbell v. United Rys., 243 Mo. 141, 147 S.W. 788. Louis E. Miller for respondent. (1) T......
-
Taylor v. Lumaghi Coal Co., No. 38756.
...Sup.), 253 S.W. 1023; Leighton v. Davis (Mo. 181 S.W.2d 541 Sup.), 260 S.W. 986; Rose v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co., 315 Mo. 1181, 289 S.W. 913; Cole v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co., 332 Mo. 999, 61 S.W. (2d) 344, judgments were reduced from larger amounts to between $10,000 to $12,......
Request a trial to view additional results