Rosemond v. State

Decision Date13 April 1908
Citation110 S.W. 229,86 Ark. 160
PartiesROSEMOND v. STATE
CourtArkansas Supreme Court

Appeal from Lafayette Circuit Court; Jacob M. Carter, Judge affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Searcy & Parks and Wm. L. Moose, for appellant.

It is conceded that the evidence is sufficient to convict appellant of murder in the second degree, but it is not sufficient to sustain the conviction of murder in the first degree. 82 Ark 97; 37 Ark. 239; 83 Ark. 268.

William F. Kirby, Attorney General, and Daniel Taylor, assistant, for appellee.

Malice is shown, and a spirit of revenge harbored by appellant against deceased for sometime previous to the assault. That it was premeditated is shown by appellant's own testimony, and the club used was a deadly weapon. The evidence sustains the verdict.

OPINION

HILL C. J.

Appellant 's counsel thus states his case: "About six-thirty o'clock on the evening of March 2, 1907, Charles Lewis and two or three other negro companions were walking along the road or street leading from the commissary at Stamps, Arkansas. They were going home from their work at the end of the day, and the way led over a bridge across a body of water known as the 'Pond.' Just before reaching the bridge, they overtook the defendant, Ike Rosemond, another negro, who was known to the others not as Rosemond but as 'Big Boy.' The defendant joined them, and they walked along in 'rotation,' as one of the witnesses states it. Before they overtook him, the defendant had picked up a stick about three feet long and about two by three inches. After they had gone about two hundred yards on the way across the pond, without warning the defendant stepped around in front of Charles Lewis, and knocked him down with the stick, and struck him the second time as he fell, and was about to strike him the third time when John Seawood spoke to him and said: 'Don't do that, Big Boy,' whereupon the defendant dropped the stick and went back towards town. Lewis's skull was fractured, and he died about eleven o'clock that night. The defendant was tried and convicted of murder in the first degree and sentenced to be hanged."

To this statement may be added these facts: The stick with which Lewis was killed was larger at one end than the other, having been trimmed at one end so that it was a handy weapon. Lewis weighed about 150 pounds, and Rosemond was a stout man. Lewis had caused Rosemond to be fined for having carried a pistol and Rosemond bore a grudge against him therefor, and had threatened to get even with him for this act. A few minutes before the assault, Rosemond said he intended going away. Immediately after the assault, he fled the country. Rosemond testified that he was mad at Lewis for having caused him to be fined, and that he intended to give him a whipping, but did not intend to...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Borland v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • March 26, 1923
    ... ... 14, 15 and 19; Chowning v. State, 91 Ark ... 503. Also in refusing appellant's requested instruction ... 6, 7 and 8. Harris v. State, 119 Ark. 85; ... Howard v. State. 82 Ark. 97; King ... v. State, 117 Ark. 82; Gilchrist v ... State, 100 Ark. 330; Rosemond v ... State, 86 Ark. 160. Instruction 6 exact copy of ... instruction held erroneously refused in Chowning v ... State, 91 Ark. 503. See also 91 Ark. 505; 94 Ark ... 75; 103 Ark. 33; 102 Ark. 511; 36 L. R. A. 465. As to 7, ... Thorpe v. State, 99 Ark. 188 ...          J ... S ... ...
  • Johnson v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • February 26, 1917
    ... ... legally sufficient to sustain a conviction of murder in the ... first degree. Strong v. State, 85 Ark. 536, ... 109 S.W. 536; Kinslow v. State, 85 Ark ... 514, 109 S.W. 524; Ferguson v. State, 92 ... Ark. 120, 122 S.W. 236; Coats v. State, 101 ... Ark. 51, 141 S.W. 197; Rosemond v. State, ... 86 Ark. 160, 110 S.W. 229; King v. State, ... 117 Ark. 82, 173 S.W. 852 ...          It is ... insisted by counsel for the defendant that the judgment ... should be reversed because the court refused to give ... instruction No. 3, asked by the defendant. The ... ...
  • Williams v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • February 4, 1924
    ... ... weapon used was such as was ordinarily calculated to produce ... death. Thus, all the elements of murder in the second degree ... are found in the testimony, and justify the verdict of the ... jury convicting him of that crime. Rosemond ... ...
  • Columbia County Bank v. Emerson
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • April 27, 1908
    ... ... Emerson or ... their legal representatives sole and exclusive agent for ... the sale of the Karner Sash Lock in the county of Nevada, ... State of Arkansas, in which to begin work, and for one year ... from date hereof I hereby authorize said agent to order ... locks from Nickel ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT