Rosemond v. United States
| Decision Date | 28 May 2013 |
| Docket Number | No. 12–895.,12–895. |
| Citation | 133 S.Ct. 2734 (Mem),569 U.S. 1003,186 L.Ed.2d 191 |
| Parties | Justus Cornelius ROSEMOND, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES. |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
569 U.S. 1003
133 S.Ct. 2734 (Mem)
186 L.Ed.2d 191
Justus Cornelius ROSEMOND, petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 12–895.
Supreme Court of the United States
May 28, 2013.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit granted.
To continue reading
Request your trial
6 cases
-
United States v. Acosta-ColóN
...for Writ of Certiorari at I, Rosemond v. United States, No. 12–895 (U.S. Jan. 16, 2013); see also Rosemond v. United States, –––U.S. ––––, 133 S.Ct. 2734, 186 L.Ed.2d 191 (2013) (granting certiorari). 15. We can and do rely on Badamo as persuasive authority. See 1st Cir. R. 32.1.0(a). 16. F......
-
Rosemond v. United States
...had presented no sufficient reason for departing from that precedent. See 695 F.3d, at 1156.We granted certiorari, 569 U.S. ––––, 133 S.Ct. 2734, 186 L.Ed.2d 191 (2013), to resolve the Circuit conflict over what it takes to aid and abet a § 924(c) offense. Although we disagree with Rosemond......
-
Eccleston v. Ortiz
...the scene of the crime.(Addendum No. 1, Dkt. No. 1-2.) In his second Addendum ("Addendum No. 2"), Petitioner assertsIn Rosemond [v. United States, 133 S. Ct. 2734 (2013)] the U.S. Supreme Court made a substantive rule alteration in the range of conduct or the class of persons the law can pu......
-
United States v. D-4 Tevin Bivins
...Court's grant of certiorari in the case of United States v. Rosemond, 695 F.3d 1151 (10th Cir.2012), cert. granted, ––– U.S. ––––, 133 S.Ct. 2734, 186 L.Ed.2d 191 (2013). The Supreme Court has now ruled in this case, see Rosemond v. United States, –––U.S. ––––, 134 S.Ct. 1240, 188 L.Ed.2d 2......
Request a trial to view additional results