Rosenbaum v. Fliegelman, 51423
Decision Date | 19 September 1979 |
Docket Number | No. 51423,51423 |
Citation | 375 So.2d 223 |
Parties | Sidney L. ROSENBAUM v. Maud R. FLIEGELMAN. |
Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
H. Stennis Little, Jr., John B. Owens, Jr., Nashville, Tenn., for appellant.
Bourdeaux & Jones, Thomas D. Bourdeaux, Meridian, for appellee.
Before SMITH, LEE and BOWLING, JJ.
LEE, Justice, for the Court:
Sidney L. Rosenbaum filed a petition in the Chancery Court of Lauderdale County to terminate a testamentary trust created by his parents, I. A. Rosenbaum, Sr. and Anne R. Rosenbaum. Sidney L. Rosenbaum was beneficiary under the trust, the chancellor declined to terminate same, and Rosenbaum has appealed. We affirm.
On January 8, 1965, Anne R. Rosenbaum and I. A. Rosenbaum, Sr., husband and wife, executed identical wills wherein they devised to their children, I. A. Rosenbaum, Jr., Maud R. Fliegelman, and Sidney L. Rosenbaum, an undivided one-third (1/3) interest each in their respective estates. On June 14, 1965, Mr. and Mrs. Rosenbaum executed codicils to their said wills which provided that any share or parts of their estates which should go to their son, Sidney L. Rosenbaum, "shall not go to him in fee simple absolute but shall be put in trust for him as the 'Sidney L. Rosenbaum Trust'." They named I. A. Rosenbaum, Jr. trustee without bond and with complete and unlimited power and authority to administer the trust as he saw fit and in accordance with his own judgment and discretion. The codicils further provided that in the event I. A. Rosenbaum, Jr. was unable to serve for any reason, Maud R. Fliegelman should serve as trustee with the same power and authority.
I. A. Rosenbaum, Jr. served as trustee from 1967 until December 17, 1976, when his resignation as trustee was accepted by the court. Maud R. Fliegelman was appointed substitute trustee and she served as such until May 18, 1978, when she petitioned the court to accept her resignation. She was temporarily retained as trustee until November 7, 1978 when the chancellor appointed Merchants and Farmers Bank, Meridian, Mississippi, as substitute trustee. Appellant had no objection to the resignation of Maud R. Fliegelman, but requested that the court terminate the trust and distribute the assets to him, or, in the alternative, appoint H. Stennis Little, Jr., Attorney, as successor trustee.
Appellant first contends that the trust was without any purpose, hence it must be dissolved and the assets distributed to Sidney L. Rosenbaum.
Appellant makes the argument that the wills and codicils provided no possible trust purpose, there is no existing instrument which could properly be incorporated in the will to supply purpose, and there are no facts which have any significance apart from their effect upon the distribution of the property devised. Further he contends that the trust does not set up a valid spendthrift trust and that it was the intention of the testator/testatrix that Sidney should have the property.
Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. First National Bank, 352 So.2d 1324 (Miss.1977), set forth the duty of the court in construing a trust provision:
The codicils in full read:
It is my desire and request that any share or part of my estate that shall, under this will, go to my son, Sidney L. Rosenbaum, shall not go to him in fee simple absolute, but shall be in trust for him as...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Maupin v. Perry's Estate
...first and most important rule in the construction of wills is that the intention of the testator should prevail. E. g., Rosenbaum v. Fliegelman, 375 So.2d 223 (Miss.1979); Nobles v. Sanders, 370 So.2d 703 However, we are unable, as the trial court was, to ascertain from the questioned claus......