Rosenbaum v. Rosenbaum

• Decision Date: 06 March 2000
• Citation: 704 N.Y.S.2d 839,270 A.D.2d 242
• Parties: JUDITH ROSENBAUM, Appellant,<BR>v.<BR>REUVEN ROSENBAUM, Defendant.<BR>MICHELE S. MARWILL, Nonparty Respondent.
• Court: New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

270 A.D.2d 242

704 N.Y.S.2d 839

JUDITH ROSENBAUM, Appellant,

v.REUVEN ROSENBAUM, Defendant.

MICHELE S. MARWILL, Nonparty Respondent.

Decided March 6, 2000.

Ritter, J. P., Altman, Krausman and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

On the record presented, the Supreme Court's determination and apportionment of the Law Guardian's fee was not improper (see, Matter of Bungay v Morin, 256 AD2d 462; Petek v Petek, 239 AD2d 327; Richards v Richards, 189 AD2d 1025; Matter of Mouscardy v Mouscardy, 63 AD2d 973).

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit.