Ross v. Ristaino, Civ. A. No. 74-15-S.
Decision Date | 24 June 1974 |
Docket Number | Civ. A. No. 74-15-S. |
Citation | 388 F. Supp. 99 |
Parties | James ROSS, Jr., Petitioner, v. Theodore RISTAINO et al., Respondents. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts |
Michael G. West, Kamberg, Berman & Hendel, Springfield, Mass., for petitioner.
Dennis J. LaCroix, Asst. Atty. Gen., Robert H. Quinn, Atty. Gen., Boston, Mass., for respondent.
Petitioner was convicted of armed robbery, assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon, and assault and battery with intent to murder. Petitioner is black, and the victim, a security guard at Boston University, is white. At the trial, petitioner's counsel asked the judge to put the following question to the jurors in the course of a voir dire:
Counsel for co-defendants asked for other questions directed to the issue of racial prejudice.
The trial judge declined to ask the requested questions, but did give instructions and ask questions of the jurors which dealt meticulously and extensively with the general issue of bias and prejudice, but did not specifically direct the jurors' attention to the possibility of racial prejudice. The defendant had been identified to the jurors. Two of the jurors asked to be excused because they were prejudiced. One stated explicitly that the prejudice which he entertained was racial. The other's prejudice was not identified. Various other jurors were excused because of preconceived opinions and connections with the police or with Boston University.
On appeal to the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, the petitioner's convictions were upheld. Commonwealth v. Ross, 1972 Adv.Sh. 873, 282 N.E.2d 70 (1972). The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari, vacated the judgment and remanded the case for reconsideration in the light of its decision in Ham v. South Carolina, 409 U.S. 524, 93 S.Ct. 848, 35 L.Ed.2d 46 (1973). Ross v. Massachusetts, 410 U.S. 901, 93 S.Ct. 968, 35 L.Ed.2d 265 (1973). The Supreme Judicial Court reconsidered the case and again affirmed. Commonwealth v. Ross, 1973 Adv.Sh. 839, 296 N.E.2d 810. Ross' second petition for certiorari to the United States Supreme Court was denied, with vigorous dissents by Justices Marshall, Douglas and Brennan. Ross v. Massachusetts, 414 U.S. 1080, 94 S.Ct. 599, 38 L.Ed.2d 486.
In Ham v. South Carolina, supra, the Court held that Ham, a well-known black activist charged with possession of marijuana, was entitled to have the judge put a question to the prospective jurors specifically directed to the issue of racial prejudice. The Court relied on Aldridge v. United States, 283 U.S. 308, 51 S.Ct. 470, 75 L.Ed. 1054 (1931), in which it was held that such a question was required in a trial in a federal court, as one of the "essential demands of fairness."
On remand, the Supreme Judicial Court treated Ham as being limited to situations in which the defendant had become a "special target" of discrimination, relying on the use by Mr. Justice Rehnquist of such common judicial locutions as "in this case" and "under the facts shown on this record."
The Ham opinion rests on Aldridge, however, and the defendant in Aldridge was nobody of special notoriety prior to his indictment. The true significance of Ham is that it extends the rule of Aldridge to trials in state courts.
The questions propounded to the jurors in the present case were directed to the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Com. v. Hobbs
...810, cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1080, 94 S.Ct. 599, 38 L.Ed.2d 486 (1973) (with dissents), habeas corpus granted sub nom. Ross v. Ristaino, 388 F.Supp. 99 (D.Mass.), aff'd, 508 F.2d 754 (1st Cir. 1974), rev'd, Ristaino v. Ross, 424 U.S. 589, 96 S.Ct. 1017, 47 L.Ed.2d 258 (1976), and "suggest a ......
-
Com. v. Weichell
...810, cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1080, 94 S.Ct. 599, 38 L.Ed.2d 486 (1973) (with dissents), habeas corpus granted sub nom. Ross v. Ristaino, 388 F.Supp. 99 (D.Mass.), aff'd, 508 F.2d 754 (1st Cir.1974), rev'd, 424 U.S. 589, 96 S.Ct. 1017, 47 L.Ed.2d 258 (1976); United States v. Moskowitz, 581 F.......
-
Com. v. Booker
...810, cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1080, 94 S.Ct. 599, 38 L.Ed.2d 486 (1973) (with dissents), habeas corpus granted sub nom. Ross v. Ristaino, 388 F.Supp. 99 (D.Mass.), aff'd, 508 F.2d 754 (1st Cir. 1974), rev'd, 424 U.S. 589, 96 S.Ct. 1017, 47 L.Ed.2d 258 (1976) )." Commonwealth v. Fillippini, 1 ......
-
Com. v. Sanders
...N.E.2d 810 cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1080, 94 S.Ct. 599, 38 L.Ed.2d 486 (1973) (with dissents), habeas corpus granted sub nom. Ross v. Ristaino, 388 F.Supp. 99 (D.Mass.), aff'd, 508 F.2d 754 (1st Cir. 1974), rev'd Ristaino v. Ross, 424 U.S. 589, 96 S.Ct. 1017, 47 L.Ed.2d 258 (1976), we held th......