Rotbart v. Jordan Marsh Co.
| Decision Date | 31 December 1974 |
| Docket Number | No. 74--781,74--781 |
| Citation | 305 So.2d 255 |
| Parties | Moises M. ROTBART, Appellant, v. JORDAN MARSH COMPANY, a Florida Corporation, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Frates, Floyd, Pearson, Stewart, Proenza & Richman and Andrew C. Hall, Miami, for appellant.
Stephens, Magill, Thornton & Sevier and Ronald Willis, Miami, for appellees.
Before HENDRY, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.
Appellant, plaintiff in the trial court, seeks review of an order granting the defendants' motion to dismiss his amended complaint with prejudice.
Appellant filed suit against the defendant Jordan Marsh Company and its insurance company seeking damages in excess of $500,000.
His complaint alleged that on the afternoon of May 1, 1971, appellant drove his car into the second floor parking garage at the 163rd Street Jordan Marsh Department Store, intending to patronize the store.
After parking his vehicle, appellant walked to an elevator and discovered it was not operating. The complaint alleged that no sign was posted indicating the elevator wasn't working or that a staircase was available as an alternative.
Further, the complaint stated that while searching for an exit, the appellant was accosted by two armed robbers, who robbed him, beat him, and left him unconscious and severely injured.
The appellant charged Jordan Marsh with negligence in failing to maintain the elevator in working order or failing to have an exit marked as required by law, or alternatively in failing to provide adequate security protection to patrons to prevent such criminal assaults which appellant contends are reasonable foreseeable.
As support for this latter contention, appellant stated in his amended complaint that Jordan Marsh maintains a security staff trained to prevent similar thefts against the store, but not instructed to prevent such activities directed against the store's patrons.
Our sole concern in this case is whether or not as a matter of law the appellant's complaint states a cause of action. We think it does.
Both parties concede that appellant occupies the legal position of a business invitee. Therefore, the defendant owes him the duty of keeping its premises in a reasonably safe condition, and to guard against subjecting him to dangers of which Jordan Marsh is cognizant or which it reasonably might have foreseen. McNulty v. Hurley, Fla.1957, 97 So.2d 185; Graham v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Lipkin v. Norwegian Cruise Line Ltd.
...599–600 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1981) ; Fernandez v. Miami Jai–Alai, Inc., 386 So.2d 4, 5 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1980) ; Rotbart v. Jordan Marsh Co., 305 So.2d 255, 256 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1974) ; Johnson v. Hatoum, 239 So.2d 22, 24–25 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1970) ; Stevens v. Jefferson, 436 So.2d 33, 34 (Fla.19......
-
Holley v. Mt. Zion Terrace Apartments, Inc.
...Corp., 365 So.2d 177 (Fla.2d DCA 1978); Rosier v. Gainesville Inns Associates, 347 So.2d 1100 (Fla.1st DCA 1977); Rotbart v. Jordan Marsh Co., 305 So.2d 255 (Fla.3d DCA 1974); Cooper v. IBI Security Service of Florida, Inc., 281 So.2d 524 (Fla.3d DCA 1973), cert. denied, 287 So.2d 95 (Fla.1......
-
Craig v. A.A.R. Realty Corp.
...business invitees from criminal acts of third persons consistent with Restatement (Second) of Torts § 344.); Rotbart v. Jordan Marsh Co., Fla.App.Dist. 3, 305 So.2d 255 (1974) (Owner-operator of a department store had duty to protect business invitee from criminal acts of third persons whic......
-
Fernandez v. Miami Jai-Alai, Inc.
...might have reasonably foreseen. Sabatelli v. Omni International Hotels, Inc., 379 So.2d 444 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Rotbart v. Jordan Marsh Company, 305 So.2d 255 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); Sparks v. Ober, 192 So.2d 81 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966). Included among those dangers is a criminal assault by a third p......
-
Liability for negligently disabling or failing to repair a traffic signal: absolute immunity in the Third District?
...(Fla. 2d D.C.A. 1978); Rosier v. Gainesville Ins. Associates, Inc., 347 So. 2d 1100 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1977); Rotbart v. Jordan Marsh Co., 305 So. 2d 255 (Fla. 3d D.C.A. [2] As the Third District Court itself put it in an earlier regime: "It is well-established that if the reasonable possibil......