Rothstein v. Golf Club Co.

Decision Date04 June 1958
Docket NumberNo. 20027,20027
Citation104 S.E.2d 83,214 Ga. 187
PartiesHarry Irwin ROTHSTEIN, by Next Friend, v. GOLF CLUB COMPANY.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Certiorari to Court of Appeals.

G. Seals Aiken, Chas. W. Bergman, Atlanta, for plaintiff in error.

John D. Jones, Greene, Neely, Buckley & DeRieux, Atlanta, for defendant in error.

Syllabus Opinion by the Court

ALMAND, Justice.

After a careful consideration of the record in this case and of the decision rendered by the Court of Appeals (97 Ga.App. 128, 102 S.E.2d 654), we are of the opinion that the court did not err in reversing the judgment of the trial court.

Judgment affirmed.

All the justices concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Thompson v. Crownover
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 18 mars 1988
    ...to effectuate that change judicially. The "patent defect" rule has been endorsed by the Supreme Court. See Rothstein v. Golf Club Co., 214 Ga. 187, 104 S.E.2d 83 (1958), aff'g 97 Ga.App. 128, 102 S.E.2d 654 (1958); Aikin v. Perry, 119 Ga. 263, 46 S.E. 93 (1903). Included among the legal pri......
  • Slaughter v. Slaughter
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 15 juillet 1970
    ... ... 580(3), 174 S.E.2d 474. There is no liability from ownership alone, Golf Club Co. v. Rothstein, 97 Ga.App. 128, 133, 102 S.E.2d 654, aff'd 214 Ga. 187, 104 S.E.2d ... 83; ... ...
  • Udy v. Calvary Corp., 1
    • United States
    • Arizona Court of Appeals
    • 17 août 1989
    ... ... 602 (2d Cir.1917) (landlord had no duty to its tenants to erect a fence); Golf Club Co. v. Rothstein, 97 Ga.App. 128, 102 S.E.2d 654 (1958), aff'd, 214 Ga. 187, 104 S.E.2d 83 ... ...
  • John Aragona Enterprises, Inc. v. Miller
    • United States
    • Virginia Supreme Court
    • 9 octobre 1972
    ...437, 438, 95 S.E. 394, 398 (1918); Golf Club Company v. Rothstein, 97 Ga.App. 128, 130--132, 102 S.E.2d 654, 655--656, aff'd 214 Ga. 187, 104 S.E.2d 83 (1958); Jones v. United States, 241 F.2d 26 (4th Cir. Berlin v. Wall, Supra, involved an action by the infant child of a tenant seeking to ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT