Rottman v. Bartling
Decision Date | 10 November 1887 |
Citation | 35 N.W. 126,22 Neb. 375 |
Parties | FREDERICK W. ROTTMANN ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. H. H. BARTLING ET AL., APPELLEES |
Court | Nebraska Supreme Court |
APPEAL from the district court of Otoe county. Tried below before POUND, J.
Reversed.
S. H Calhoun, for appellants, cited: Ass. Reformed Church v Theological Seminary, 4 N.J.Eq. 77. Lucas v. Case, 9 Bush, 302. Groesbeeck v. Dunscomb, 41 How. Pr 302. Ferraria v. Vasconcelles, 23 Ill. 56. First Presbyterian Church v. Cong. Society, 23 Iowa 567. Winebrenner v. Colder, 43 Penn. State, 244. Perry on Trusts, Secs. 727, 734. Feizel v. Trustees, 9 Kan. 592.
Frank T. Ransom and John C. Watson, for appellees, cited: Lucas v. Case, 9 Bush., 297. People v. German Church, 53 N.Y. 103. German Reformed Church v. Seibert, 3 Penn. State, 282. Den v. Bolton, 12 N.J.L. 206. Burrel v. Church, 44 Barb., 282. Miller v. English, 2 Halst. Ch., 304.
The plaintiffs allege in their petition "that they are residents of Nebraska City in Otoe county, state of Nebraska; that on the 20th day of January, 1867, at said Nebraska City, the said First Evangelical Lutheran church in Nebraska City, Nebraska, was duly organized under the laws and regulations of the general synod of the Evangelical Lutheran church of the United States, and was then duly incorporated under the general incorporation law of the then territory, now state, of Nebraska, by the election of a board of trustees, consisting of Eli Huber, Charles C. Walbaum, F. Templin, H. H. Petring, A. F. Mollring, Frederick W. Rottmann, and John Stromer, and adopted a constitution in accordance with the rules and regulations of the general synod; that under said constitution two of said trustees are called deacons, and two of them are called elders, and two of them are called trustees, and that said officers, together with the pastor, constitute the council of said congregation, and have charge of its affairs, and control and custody of its property, and hold all the same in trust for said congregation, subject to and in accordance with the rules and regulations of said general synod; that shortly after said organization, the said congregation purchased lots one and two in block eight, as designated on the recorded plat of South Nebraska City, now a part of Nebraska City, in Otoe county, Nebraska, and during said year of 1867 erected thereon a commodious building for public worship to be therein held according to the doctrines, beliefs, and discipline of the said Evangelical Lutheran church, and for such other purposes as said congregation might properly see fit to use said building in connection with ordinary church work of said Evangelical Lutheran Society.
In their answer, the defendants admit "that on the 20th day of January, 1867, the First Evangelical Lutheran church in Nebraska City, Nebraska, was duly organized, as in the petition stated, and admit the election of the persons therein named as a board of trustees, and that a constitution was adopted, as in the petition alleged, and that under said constitution two of said trustees are called deacons, and two are called...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Boyles v. Roberts
...75 N.C. 134; Protchett v. Schaefer, 11 Phila. 166; Lamb v. Cain, 14 L. R. A. 528; State v. Foraker, 6 L. R. A. 422; Rottman v. Borthing, 22 Neb. 375; Schlichter v. Keiter, 156 P. A. 119; Hochreter's App., 93 P. A. 479; State v. Swift, 69 Ind. 505; Phillomoth v. Wyatt, 26 L. R. A. 78; Clask ......
- Rottman v. Bartling