Rounds v. State, 79-1026

Decision Date08 April 1980
Docket NumberNo. 79-1026,79-1026
Citation382 So.2d 775
PartiesRobert Leonard ROUNDS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Weiner, Robbins, Tunkey & Ross and Ronald Dion, Miami, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Calvin L. Fox, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HUBBART and NESBITT, JJ., and CHARLES A. CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of conviction and sentence under review is affirmed upon a holding that (a) the defendant failed to preserve for appellate review the admissibility of the defendant's statements to the police as he did not object at trial to the admission of such statements subsequent to the denial of his pretrial motion to suppress. Jones v. State, 360 So.2d 1293 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Tennant v. State, 205 So.2d 324 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967); see Clark v. State, 363 So.2d 331 (Fla.1978); and (b) the trial court did not commit error in denying the defendant's motion for judgment of acquittal and motion for new trial as the evidence presented at trial was sufficient to sustain a conviction for manslaughter and did not establish the defense of self defense or excusable homicide as a matter of law. Popps v. State, 120 Fla. 387, 162 So. 701 (1935); W. LaFave & A. W. Scott, Jr., Criminal Law 572, 574 (1972); Perkins on Criminal Law 54, 60 (2d ed. 1969).

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Lusk v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 30, 1988
    ...self-defense under any version of the facts involved in this case. As support for that instruction, the judge cited Rounds v. State, 382 So.2d 775 (Fla.3d DCA 1980), "for the sole proposition that evidence may not establish defense of self-defense as a matter of law." Defense's objections a......
  • Schwarck v. State, 89-1730
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 30, 1990
    ...3d DCA 1981). Further, the defendant failed to preserve the issue for review by a contemporaneous objection at trial. Rounds v. State, 382 So.2d 775 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). 4. There was no objection to the admission of collateral crimes evidence which the defendant now attacks. Nevertheless, th......
  • Boulerice v. State, 90-2512
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 17, 1991
    ...and Katherine B. Johnson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee. Before HUBBART, COPE and GODERICH, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Rounds v. State, 382 So.2d 775 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Jones v. State, 360 So.2d 1293 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Tennant v. State, 205 So.2d 324 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967), cert. denied, 210......
  • Davis v. State, 97-2790.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • March 12, 1999
    ...voluntarily after Miranda warnings were given, because defendant failed to raise contemporaneous objection at trial); Rounds v. State, 382 So.2d 775, 775 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (affirming judgment of conviction and sentence for manslaughter because "the defendant failed to preserve for appellat......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT