Rouse v. City of Kinston

Decision Date21 June 1924
Docket Number228.
Parties188 N.C. 1, 35 A.L.R. 1203 v. CITY OF KINSTON. ROUSE
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court

Appeal from Superior Court, Lenoir County; Grady, Judge.

Action by N. J. Rouse against the City of Kinston. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. No error.

Stacy J., dissenting.

In action of trespass against city to recover for injury to land caused by sinking of wells on nearby land, resulting in drying up of wells on land, admission of evidence tending to show condition of plaintiff's farm from time of alleged trespass until some 50 or 60 years prior thereto held not material or reversible error.

Whether city sinking artesian wells made unreasonable use of percolating waters, thus drying up artesian wells on adjoining land, held properly submitted to the jury.

The material facts are:

The plaintiff, N. J. Rouse, was a resident of Kinston since 1883 and a native of Lenoir county. In 1914 he bought what is known as the "Caswell Lodge Plantation," about 2 miles west of Kinston on the state central highway, No. 10 containing 581 acres--approximately 300 acres of wood and timber land that is in low ground subject to overflow, and about 281 acres of cleared land. The "Ginhouse" tract was purchased later and contained about 18 acres.

It was in evidence that when the plaintiff purchased the plantation it was in a complete state of dilapidation and had the appearance of a farm being neglected and practically going to waste--no sign of paint, no buildings on it, except the main building, a few old barns, with roofs practically off, two or three little tobacco barns and tenant houses that had gone to decay. The water that was available was from open wells, and the water was poor, repellant, unhealthy, not drinkable.

Dr. W T. Parrott testified:

"The health conditions prevailing on the Caswell Lodge place up to the time Mr. Rouse bought it I would say were as bad as the health conditions in the Mississippi bottom. It had a bad reputation--the way the land ran, in a slope and the drainage from the hills above. It had shallow wells. It was worse than a perfectly flat place. All the organic waste from the hills would naturally filter there. I saw the place after Mr. Rouse had dug these wells. I have practiced medicine on the plaintiff's plantation both before and after he bought it, and as far as practice on that farm was concerned, the deep wells practically put me out of business. * * * Beginning in 1903 or 1904 the general health of the community has increased wonderfully. I recall the health conditions in this vicinity in 1902. Typhoid fever is communicable through the drinking water, but such things as malarial chills come from another source--surface conditions bring that about. In the last 23 years the ideas of the general public and the profession as to community health problems has undergone a complete change. The surface drainage of this place as well as others similarly situated has removed the malarial conditions by removing the mosquito that caused it."

The health conditions were bad. Could not get any drinking water on the place; could smell it when it was gotten out of the wells. The water was muddy. The people who lived on the place were sickly and many died. In wet seasons the water looked like stagnant water from pools. Scum collected on it. For farming it was practically abandoned; very little farming done on it. White or negro tenants would not live on it. It was good land; the trouble was the water.

D. F. Wooten, ex-sheriff of the county and president of the First National Bank of Kinston, who had 17 years' experience in farm operation, and who owned half of the land for 10 or 12 years, testified that the farm was unhealthy and the water not there for domestic purposes.

This was the condition of the plantation when the plaintiff bought it. The plaintiff was mayor of Kinston. The first artesian well dug in Kinston was at the corner of the old pumping station. It was discovered August 8, 1904, and that well discharged between 30 and 40 gallons natural flow. The plaintiff testified:

"My first experience with artesian wells was when I was mayor. That well was dug at the direction of Dr. Tull and myself. He was chairman of the board of county commissioners, and it was an experiment, and when that water came up that water ascended the pipes 7 or 8 feet."

With the experience that the plaintiff had in that locality, artesian wells were the only ones that would furnish pure and wholesome water fit for domestic purposes. He said:

"I began to explore for deep wells promptly after I got it. I saw it was impossible to get tenants. The first objection was that there was no water and was unhealthy, and I determined to try and get deep water. * * * It is good land, all of it. The lightest soil that you can find on the plantation that is good for agricultural purposes going towards La Grange. In between the highway and the railroad down to this end it is just a little lighter than the balance, and going west it is a good clay subsoil. Cultivate excellent crops on it regularly--tobacco, corn, rye, oats, any crop that grows in this section, and it is all adequate to trucking. I knew when I bought the place that it was necessary to drive an artesian well, which I did. When I bought that place I did not own the 'Gin' premises mentioned here. I bought the 'Gin' premises and there was a well there sunk by a former owner and was running feebly--furnished sufficient water for the tenants until these wells were put down. The first thing I did was to condemn the open well at the northern end of the porch of the main building and had this well sunk there at the back porch and brought from the back porch and entered into this basin, and it produced as fine water as any we have. The well was not as good a well as the second one. It was a good well and good water, and abundant. The water went to a depth of 200 feet, and we piped the water to a reservoir on the back porch, used it for several years on the back porch. I had two lines piped to the well. One line I took off to the dairy which is about 20 feet north of the back porch. I took a pipe and conducted it to the dairy and had a sink made for butter and milk, and this water ran into the sink in which the butter and milk was kept and the water was flowing continuously, didn't have to do any pumping. Then after going into the dairy, we had it so arranged that it went into the horse lot about 30 feet east of the dairy. The water was running through the trough all the time and went through the public road to the highway and watered my cattle. My cow stables are south of the road. The water from the horse lot emptied into another trough, and escaping from that it emptied into these marl holes, and was carried across the public road into the two houses that are there now. These were tenant houses. From that well I ran pipes into the tenant houses and furnished them from the same well without any artificial pressure, there were two pipes; one went to the residences, and one went into the dairy. Then a third pipe went in a northwest direction through my garden. The low ground could have been irrigated. I put down plant first. It began to sog my garden, irrigated it too much. This is the only well at the house. On the other side of this plantation some houses are scattered here and there, and I took those two residences, two houses painted red that lie west of the highway, built those houses, and I sunk a well midway between the houses to furnish them both with water. That well was carried down a depth of 200 feet, lined it all the way down, and out of that well came the largest flow of artesian water I have ever seen. I have had experience as to artesian wells. I was mayor when it was discovered that we could get artesian wells here. It was freer than the city wells. This well furnished a good deal more water than either of the city wells. We put a tap on it and reduced it, it was coming so strong you could not catch it with a dipper and a system of piping was installed and water taken into the residence further west, occupied by J. D. Stevens. That water flowed with great volume through his kitchen into the sink and went through both houses. It was 150 yards between the two houses and the well was between the two--75 yards each one was to the well. Both were dependent upon that well. Including the labor, the piping, and help incident to exploration and digging of those wells, my best estimate would be that they cost about $1,000 for the two. I might be a few hundred dollars either way. Things were cheaper then. That is not including the piping around the residence, I am speaking about the wells alone. In addition to that, the cost of pipes to the different residences. I would say that added $150 or $200 to it, I expect $200. I did not keep an account of it. The uses of this stream of water made the plantation desirable to live upon, in the first place, supplied as good water as is in the world, with the result that it is a healthy plantation. It enabled me to get an entirely satisfactory class of tenants. I can get as many tenants as I want, because it is healthy and good water. It has made it particularly desirable for a dairy. I built a silo and got me a herd of cattle. The low land is elegantly adapted for pasture land, and with the water it makes it ideal for a dairy. Another purpose, it is entirely adaptable to irrigation. The large well on the highway, which I estimate to be running 75 to 100 gallons a minute, was brought up 4 or 5 feet above the ground, which made it then in its location about 12 feet above the level of the cleared land. Immediately I saw an ideal situation for irrigation. It could have easily been carried over the
...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT