Rousseau v. Rosche
Decision Date | 11 July 1929 |
Docket Number | 21758. |
Citation | 279 P. 80,153 Wash. 54 |
Parties | ROUSSEAU v. ROSCHE et al. |
Court | Washington Supreme Court |
Department 2.
Appeal from Superior Court, King County; J. T. Ronald, Judge.
Action by Stella C. Rousseau, individually and as administratrix of the estate of Orville M. Rousseau, against Frank Rosche and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal. Reversed.
Hayden Langhorne & Metzger, of Tacoma, for appellants.
Edwin H. Flick and A. R. Rutherford, both of Seattle, for respondent.
Some time early in the summer of 1925, appellant Rosche, being engaged in the brokerage business, received oral listings of the properties of the Elbe Lumber & Shingle Company. Thereafter and about October 1, 1925, Rosche and one Rousseau, the now deceased husband of respondent, formed a sort of an association or connection, the exact nature of which is not very material, officed together in the city of Seattle, and interested themselves generally as brokers in dealing in timber properties. Thereafter Mr. Rousseau, as appears from the record, seems to have been instrumental in interesting one George Miller in this property, which consisted of lands, timber, logging railroad, logging equipment, timber contracts, forming all together quite extensive holdings. A complete and thorough examination of the properties, such as would naturally be made by a prospective purchaser, would and did take a considerable period of time. There were various negotiations back and forth, in which negotiations Mr. Rousseau seems to have taken the leading part up to the time of his death, which occurred July 23, 1926. Thereafter and on July 26, 1926, Mr. Rosche wrote the following letter to Mrs. Rousseau:
The various negotiations taking place between Miller and the Elbe Lumber & Shingle Company finally, and in the late fall of 1926, culminated in the sale of the property by the Elbe Lumber & Shingle Company to Mr. Miller. Thereafter the Elbe Company agreed to pay certain sums for services rendered, and some cash was paid and notes executed for a portion thereof, the notes running to L. T. Murray, trustee.
This action was commenced by Mrs. Rousseau to recover $12,500, she claiming that amount to be one-half of the commission earned by Rosche and Rousseau and thereafter paid. The case was tried before the court with a jury, and from a judgment in her favor for the full amount this appeal follows.
Many assignments of error have been made, but the conclusion we have reached makes it unnecessary to discuss in detail these various assignments.
It is tacitly admitted by both parties, and clearly appears in the record, that up to the time of the negotiations which covered a period of more than a year, and which culminated in the sale and transfer of the property, the only authority or agreement for a commission which Rosche, Rousseau, or any one else had, was oral. After the sale took place the following book entry was made on the books of account of the Elbe Lumber & Shingle Company:
Account No.
Name Frank Rosche, L. T. Murray, Trust Agreement.
1927 Folio Debits Credits Balance
Feb. 24 to check 3-7-27 CB $500.00
Mar. 7 to check 2-24-27 CB 250.00
Mar. 23 to check CB 500.00
Apr. 27 to Chk...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Rousseau v. Rosche
...estate of Orville M. Rousseau, deceased, against Frank Rosche and others. Judgment for plaintiff was reversed by the Supreme Court (153 Wash. 54, 279 P. 80), and, after of the remittitur, upon motion of counsel for defendants, the court entered a judgment of dismissal, from which plaintiff ......
- Morlar v. Schultz