Royal Italian Gov't v. Int'l Comm. of Young Men's Christian Associations

Decision Date31 December 1936
Citation273 N.Y. 468,6 N.E.2d 407
PartiesROYAL ITALIAN GOVERNMENT, Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIONS, Respondent.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department (246 App.Div. 590, 284 N.Y.S. 802), entered February 8, 1936, which modified, and affirmed as modified, a judgment entered upon an order of Special Term granting a motion by defendant to dismiss the complaint herein on the ground that the cause of action set forth did not accrue within the time limited by law for the commencement of an action. The complaint alleged that in 1918 and 1919 the plaintiff at the special instance and request of defendant advanced certain moneys on the latter's behalf in connection with providing the cost of transportation of freight on various steamships sailing from New York City to Italy for the purpose of carrying supplies belonging to defendant, and that defendant promised and agreed to pay the sum so advanced, but upon demand refused to pay the same. The modification by the Appellate Division consisted in striking out of the judgment for defendant the provision for costs. Borris M. Komar, of New York City, for appellant.

Raymond M. White and Harry A. Bostrom, both of New York City, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. See 273 N.Y. --, 6 N.E.(2d) 428.

CRANE, C. J., and LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, CROUCH, LOUGHRAN, and FINCH, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Guaranty Trust Co of New York v. United States 28 8212 29, 1938
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • 25 Abril 1938
    ...Lunatic Asylum v. Miller, 29 W.Va. 326, 329, 1 S.E. 740, 6 Am.St.Rep. 644, and was disregarded in Royal Italian Government v. International Committee of Y.M.C.A., 273 N.Y. 468, 6 N.E.2d 407, where neither appellate court delivered an The only support found by the court below for a different......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT