RSR v. AK, 1D01-3311.

Decision Date19 December 2001
Docket NumberNo. 1D01-3311.,1D01-3311.
Citation801 So.2d 325
PartiesR.S.R., Father of T.C.R., A Child, Petitioner, v. A.K., Mother of T.C.R., A Child, Respondent.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Robert Moeller, Cross City, for Petitioner.

Phillip K. Beck, Chiefland, for Respondent.

ERVIN, J.

We grant the petition for writ of certiorari and quash the trial court's order requiring petitioner to submit to DNA testing to determine paternity, because the trial court failed to first consider the petitioner's equitable estoppel claim or whether testing was in the child's best interest. See Marshek v. Marshek, 599 So.2d 175 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)

; Barker v. Barker, 785 So.2d 1273 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Benac v. Bree, 590 So.2d 536 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); T.D.D. v. M.J.D.D., 453 So.2d 856 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). On remand, the trial court shall appoint a guardian ad litem to represent the child's interest before resolving the issues. See Dep't of Health & Rehab. Servs. v. Privette, 617 So.2d 305 (Fla.1993).

PETITION GRANTED.

KAHN and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Flores v. Sanchez
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • March 26, 2014
    ...paternity testing, the trial court must also determine that the testing would be in the child's best interest. See R.S.R. v. A.K., 801 So.2d 325, 325 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (granting petition for writ of certiorari and quashing order compelling legal father to submit to paternity testing where......
  • Floyd v. Clark, 1D01-4994.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 19, 2001
  • Town v. Town
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 19, 2001

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT