Rubinstein v. Lucchese, Inc., 02–15–00317–CV
Decision Date | 07 July 2016 |
Docket Number | NO. 02–15–00317–CV,02–15–00317–CV |
Citation | 497 S.W.3d 615 |
Parties | Stan Rubinstein, Appellant v. Lucchese, Inc., Appellee |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Kenneth C. Johnston, Catherine E. (Kate) Gaither; Kane Russell Coleman & Logan PC, Dallas, Texas, for Appellant.
David F. Farris, John R. Lively, Daniel R. Aguilar; Lively & Associates, L.L.P., Fort Worth, Texas, for Appellee.
PANEL: DAUPHINOTand GARDNER, JJ.; and KERRY FITZGERALD (Senior Justice, Retired, Sitting by Assignment).
In this accelerated, interlocutory appeal, Appellant Stan Rubinstein challenges the trial court's order denying his special appearance. We affirm.
This case presents the question of whether the trial court may exercise personal jurisdiction over Rubinstein as an individual nonresident "guarantor." Rubinstein claims he did not execute a guaranty, but even if such a guaranty existed, Rubinstein claims there are not the requisite minimum contacts such that a Texas court can exercise specific jurisdiction over him.
According to the petition, in March of 2003, Rubinstein, a Pennsylvania resident, purchased the Pennsylvania corporation Sterling Leather Enterprises, Inc. and became president. The petition alleged Rubinstein's purposeful acts in contacting Appellee Lucchese, Inc. in Texas, seeking a credit account and asking Lucchese to provide Rubinstein with boots and other western merchandise. The parties exchanged correspondence and financial documents. On July 21, 2005, Lucchese sent Rubinstein a letter as follows:
Rubinstein replied in a fax dated July 26, 2005:
I am faxing to you the information forwarded to Mona dated April 4, 2003. This information contained a completed application and a financial statement for March 2003. As you know, I have been buying from Lucchese for years and have always paid my bills promptly. I do not like to complete duplicate guarantees and so I am forwarding an updated financial statement for your records.
Lucchese shipped merchandise from Texas to Rubinstein's offices in Pennsylvania or to the address of Sterling Leather's customers continuously from March 2003 to February 2015. During this time, Rubinstein communicated with Lucchese at its offices in Texas by mail, email, and telephone.
On June 5, 2015, Lucchese sued Sterling Leather and Rubinstein. This suit on a sworn account sought to collect monies Lucchese claimed Sterling Leather and Rubinstein owed Lucchese. Specifically, Lucchese pleaded that Sterling Leather owed Lucchese $208,718.30 for goods that Lucchese had provided to Sterling Leather. Lucchese further pleaded that Rubinstein, as Sterling Leather's personal guarantor, was liable for the debt as well.2
Rubinstein filed his verified special appearance, wherein he stated that he "[did] not have sufficient minimum contacts with Texas under either a general or specific jurisdiction theory to support the assertion of personal jurisdiction over him." Rubinstein asserted that he was a lifelong resident of Pennsylvania and was president of Sterling Leather, a corporation he purchased in March 2003, which did business with Lucchese. However, Rubinstein asserted that he had never been in Texas, done business in Texas, or owned property in Texas. Rubinstein further stated he "ha[d] never represented that he would financially back Sterling Leather" and that Lucchese's claim against him is based on "an alleged guaranty of Sterling Leather's obligations" but that Lucchese "fails to produce any guaranty or agreement."
At the special-appearance hearing, Rubinstein testified that he had never lived in Texas, had never traveled to Texas, and had not conducted business of any kind in Texas. Rubinstein also averred that he had never owned any real or personal property in Texas, nor had he ever maintained bank accounts, assets, nor paid taxes in Texas.
Rubinstein stated that he was the sole owner of his new corporation, Sterling Leather, and wanted it to do business with Lucchese. He, therefore, applied for a credit account, sending a credit application and financial statement of his corporation using his own forms, not Lucchese's forms. Rubinstein said that although he provided his name, date of birth, and social security number to Lucchese, he did not provide his own personal financial information, nor did he personally guarantee Sterling Leather's debts.
Rubinstein averred that two years into the agreement with Lucchese, Lucchese sent the July 21, 2005 letter wherein Lucchese asked Rubinstein to "complete ... their credit application along with a personal guaranty which was part of [the] application." Rubinstein testified that he did not complete either of these documents. Rubinstein acknowledged that, in response to Lucchese's request, he sent a fax which stated in part: "I do not like to complete duplicate guarantees...." When asked what he meant by this, Rubinstein testified, "What I was referring to is that I had already sent a credit application back in 2003, and there was no need for me to resend the credit application that I had originally sent." He specifically denied signing any personal guaranty on behalf of Sterling Leather. Rubinstein said that on occasion he contacted Lucchese by telephone, always in his capacity as president of Sterling Leather and not in his individual capacity.
The affidavit of Lucchese's Senior Credit Manager, Jerardo Chavira, was admitted without objection. The Chavira affidavit read in part:
Rubinstein argues that the trial court erred by denying his special appearance because (a) there is no evidence of a written guaranty but (b) even if there was a written guaranty, Rubinstein "does not have the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Atmos Energy Corp. v. Paul
...language, making it mean something different than originally intended. See Shields Ltd. P'ship , 526 S.W.3d at 486 ; Rubinstein v. Lucchese, Inc. , 497 S.W.3d 615, 625 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2016, no pet.) ; see also Fortis Benefits v. Cantu , 234 S.W.3d 642, 649 (Tex. 2007) (indicating that......
-
Nw. Cattle Feeders, LLC v. O'Connell
...and substantial justice. M & F Worldwide Corp. v. Pepsi-Cola Metro. Bottling Co. , 512 S.W.3d 878, 885 (Tex. 2017) ; Rubinstein v. Lucchese, Inc. , 497 S.W.3d 615, 623 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2016, no pet.) (citing Int'lShoe Co. v. Washington , 326 U.S. 310, 316, 66 S.Ct. 154, 158, 90 L.Ed. 9......
-
Compass Bank v. Durant
...extrinsic evidence of intent, but rather limit consideration to the provisions in the written document itself); Rubinstein v. Lucchese, Inc. , 497 S.W.3d 615, 625 (Tex. App.–Fort Worth 2016, no pet.) ("We are not permitted to rewrite an agreement to mean something it did not."). This transa......
-
J. Curt Lucas & Invenias Partners LLC v. Ryan
...and nature of Lucas's and Invenias's Texas contacts; the merits of Ryan and Más Talent's claims are irrelevant. See Rubinstein v. Lucchese, Inc., 497 S.W.3d 615, 624 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2016, no pet.) ("The issue in question is whether the trial court can exercise personal jurisdiction ov......