Rucker v. Almand

Decision Date11 January 1910
PartiesRUCKER. v. TABOR & ALMAND et al.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Execution (§ 328*)—Surplus—Claims—Adequate Remedy at Law.

A debtor executed a deed to land to secure debt to a creditor; who gave to the former a bond to reconvey the property upon payment of the debt. The debt was sued to judgment, and a quitclaim deed made by the creditor to the debtor for the purpose of having the property levied upon and sold in pursuance"of the statute. Another creditor of the debtor, holding a judgment junior to the security deed, paid off the execution based on the judgment first above mentioned and had the same transferred to him, under which the property was levied and sold. The proceeds of sale were more than sufficient to discharge the debt secured by the security deed. After the date of the security deed, but before the rendition of the junior judgment above mentioned, the debtor transferred in writing the bond for title to another creditor to secure a debt. When the land was about to be sold under execution to satisfy the debt secured by the security deed, the transferee of the bond for title and the holder of the junior judgment filed with the sheriff claims for the money that might be left after paying the debts secured by the deed, each of which creditors claimed to have a right to such fund superior to that of the other. The claims to the money were returned by the sheriff to the city court. Held. that the transferee of the bond for title has an adequate remedy at law, in a rule against the sheriff to distribute the fund in the city court; and the judge properly dismissed, on general demurrer, a petition in equity, praying to enjoin the trial of the proceedings in the city court, and to transfer the case to the court of equity, and to have the fund awarded by that court to the claim of the applicant.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Execution, Dec. Dig. § 328.*]

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Error from Superior Court, Elbert County; J. W. Worley, Judge.

Suit by Mrs. S. F. Rucker against Tabor & Almand and others. Judgment dismissing plaintiff's petition, and she brings error. Affirmed.

Z. B. Rogers, for plaintiff in error.

W. D.Tutt, for defendants in error.

ATKINSON, J. Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

*.For other cases see same topic and section NUMBER in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Reporter Indexes

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Colter v. Livingston
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 11 Octubre 1922
    ... ... sheriff. This would be true if the plaintiffs were seeking to ... make the money on their execution. Rucker v. Tabor, ... 133 Ga. 720, 66 S.E. 917; Hardwick v. Cash, 140 Ga ... 608, 79 S.E. 532. But the plaintiffs did not wish to enforce ... their fi ... ...
  • Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Brown & Randolph Co.
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 20 Septiembre 1922
    ... ... equitable relief in asserting their rights to such fund ... (Civil Code 1910, § 6037; Rucker v. Tabor, 133 Ga ... 720, 66 S.E. 917), but in this case the plaintiff is seeking ... to preserve its right to possess and enjoy the premises ... ...
  • Rucker v. Tabor & Almand
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 11 Enero 1910

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT