Ruckert v. Moore
Decision Date | 24 May 1927 |
Docket Number | No. 25557.,25557. |
Citation | 295 S.W. 794 |
Parties | RUCKERT v. MOORE. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Lawrence County; Charles L. Henson, Judge.
Action by Harry O. Ruckert, guardian of the person and estate of John G. Ruckert, against Katie Moore, wherein defendant filed a cross-bill. Judgment dismissing plaintiff's bill and for defendant on the cross-bill, and plaintiff appeals. Affirmed as to judgment of dismissal, and reversed as to that part of judgment which was responsive to defendant's cross-bill.
Charles R. Landrum, of Mountain View, and Robert Stemmons, of Mt. Vernon, for appellant.
William B. Skinner, of Springfield, for respondent.
This is an action brought by plaintiff, in a representative capacity as guardian of the person and estate of John G. Ruckert, to set aside a deed made, executed, and delivered by said John G. Ruckert on August 2, 1923, whereby he conveyed 40 acres of land in Lawrence county to defendant. Plaintiff is a son, and defendant is a daughter, of said John G. Ruckert. On July 30, 1923, an information was made and filed by plaintiff, Harry 0. Ruckert, and a brother, J. B. Ruckert, in the probate court of Lawrence county, informing that court that "J. G. Ruckert is a person incapable of managing his affairs," and praying that "inquiry be had relative to said matter." Notice of the filing of said information, directed to J. G. Ruckert, was issued by said probate court on July 30, 1923, reciting that a hearing in said matter was set for August 6, 1923, which notice was served upon said J. G. Ruckert in person by the sheriff of said county on July 30, 1923. On August 6, 1923, an order was entered by the probate court of Lawrence county adjudging J. G. Ruckert to be "a person of unsound mind and incapable of managing his affairs," and appointing H. 0. Ruckert, plaintiff herein, as the guardian of the person and estate of said J. G. Ruckert. It therefore appears from the pleadings and the proof that the deed sought to be cancelled herein was executed and delivered by John G. Ruckert. about three days after the filing of the information in the probate court and about four days before the inquiry and adjudication aforesaid, resulting in the appointment of plaintiff as the guardian of the person and estate of J. G. Ruckert.
The petition alleges:
The answer recites:
The reply is as follows:
Plaintiff, in support of the cause of action alleged in the petition, introduced in evidence the original information, the original notice of the proceeding, and the return of the sheriff thereon, and the order adjudging J. G. Ruckert to be a person of unsound mind and incapable of managing his affairs and appointing plaintiff as the guardian of the person and estate of J. G. Ruckert, all as filed and entered of record in the probate court of Lawrence county in the matter of the insanity proceeding against J. G. Ruckert. Inasmuch as these files and record have a direct bearing upon the question of the jurisdiction of the probate court of Lawrence county in the insanity proceeding, the validity of its orders made therein, and the probative effect and the conclusiveness thereof in the instant suit, we will quote the files and record of the probate court in hæc verba.
The information filed in the probate court reads:
The notice of the insanity proceeding and of the date of the hearing or inquisition, directed to, and served upon, J. G. Ruckert, is as follows:
Indorsed on the back thereof is the following:
The order entered in the insanity proceeding by said probate court on August 6, 1923, is as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Grodsky v. Bag Co.
... ... Ruckert v. Moor, 295 S.W. 794; Runyan v. Coal & Mining Co., 172 S.W. 1165; Ginter v. O'Donohue, 179 S.W. 732; Freedman v. O. Rys. Co., 293 Mo. 235; Atkinson ... ...
-
Proffer v. Proffer
...Sec. 1723, R.S. 1929; Pulitzer v. Chapman, 337 Mo. 298, 85 S.W. (2d) 411; Mann v. St. Louis-S.F. Ry. Co., 72 S.W. (2d) 981; Ruckert v. Moore, 295 S.W. 794; Lareau v. Lareau, 208 S.W. 241; Black v. Epstein, 221 Mo. 286, 120 S.W. 754; Leahey v. Cass Ave. & F.G. Ry. Co., 97 Mo. 165, 10 S.W. 61......
-
Vosburg v. Smith, 7253
...(3rd Ed.), Vol. IV, Sec. 1058, p. 20; Id., Vol. IX, Sec. 2594a, p. 597; 31 C.J.S., Evidence, Sec. 270, p. 1022.8 Ruckert v. Moore, 317 Mo. 228, 295 S.W. 794, 801(11); Fitizgerald v. Thompson, 238 Mo.App. 546, 184 S.W.2d 198, 202 (2); Butner v. Union Pac. R. Co., 236 Mo.App. 1134, 163 S.W.2d......
-
Grodsky v. Consolidated Bag Co.
...driver was entirely responsible for the accident" was competent evidence and properly received as an admission against interest. Ruckert v. Moor, 295 S.W. 794; Runyan v. Coal & Mining Co., 172 S.W. 1165; Ginter O'Donohue, 179 S.W. 732; Freedman v. O. Rys. Co., 293 Mo. 235; Atkinson v. Schoo......