Rudnicki v. Hearst Corp.

• Decision Date: 01 May 1969
• Citation: 247 N.E.2d 698,355 Mass. 800
• Parties: Chester RUDNICKI v. The HEARST CORPORATION et al.
• Court: United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court

Page 698

247 N.E.2d 698

355 Mass. 800

Chester RUDNICKI v. The HEARST CORPORATION et al.

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk.

Argued April 8, 1969.

Decided May 1, 1969.

Chester Rudnicki, pro se.

Gerald May, Boston, for The Hearst Corp.

Robert T. Capeless, Boston, for the Boston Herald-Traveler Corp.

Robert J. Hallisey, Boston, for the Globe Newspaper Co.

Before WILKINS, C.J., and SPALDING, CUTTER, KIRK and SPIEGEL, JJ.

RESCRIPT.

In this action of tort each of the three defendants demurred to the declaration, and each demurrer was sustained. The plaintiff demurred to the answers filed by each defendant and these demurrers were overruled. The plaintiff moved for judgment against all the defendants and this motion was denied. From these orders the plaintiff appealed. The order denying the motion for judgment was not appealable. Wishnewsky v. Town of Saugus, 325 Mass. 191, 192, 89 N.E.2d 783. There was no error.

Orders sustained defendants' demurrers affirmed.

Orders overruling plaintiff's demurrers affirmed.

Appeal from order denying plaintiff's motion for judgment dismissed.

Judgments for defendants.