Ruff v. State

Decision Date04 November 1915
Docket Number(No. 6394.)
Citation17 Ga.App. 337,86 S.E. 784
PartiesRUFF. v. STATE.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Russell, C. J., dissenting.

Error from Superior Court, Haralson County; A. L. Bartlett, Judge.

W. T. Ruff was convicted of perjury, and brings error. Affirmed.

J. E. Mozley, of Marietta, for plaintiff in error.

J. R. Hutcheson, Sol. Gen., of Douglasville, C. E. Roop, of Carrollton, and Griffith & Matthews, of Buchanan, for the State.

WADE, J. Judgment affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Cluck v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • June 29, 1936
    ... ... administered by the duly elected, qualified and acting clerk ... in open court, in the presence of the presiding judge, there ... was not a fatal variance." See also Strader v ... Commonwealth, 240 Ky. 559, 42 S.W.2d 736; ... Commonwealth v. Kane, 92 Ky. 457, 18 S.W ... 7; Ruff v. State, 17 Ga.App. 337, 86 S.E ... 784; Smith v. People, 32 Colo. [192 Ark ... 1042] 251, 75 P. 914; People v. Nolte, 44 ... N.Y.S. 443; State v. Spencer, 6 Ore. 152 ...          In the ... case of Cutler v. Territory, 8 Okla. 101, ... 56 P. 861, an indictment for perjury ... ...
  • Cluck v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • June 29, 1936
    ...See, also, Strader v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, 240 Ky. 559, 42 S.W.(2d) 736; Commonwealth v. Kane, 92 Ky. 457, 18 S.W. 7; Ruff v. State, 17 Ga.App. 337, 86 S.E. 784; Smith v. People, 32 Colo. 251, 75 P. 914; People v. Nolte, 19 Misc. 674, 44 N.Y.S. 443; State v. Spencer, 6 Or. In the case ......
  • Herndon v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • January 28, 1916
    ... ... "should be demonstrated by an argument incorporated in ... the indictment"; but it must appear, from the recitals ... in the indictment, how and in what manner the testimony ... alleged to be false was in fact material in the trial of the ... issue when such testimony was delivered. Ruff v ... State, 17 Ga.App. 337, 86 S.E. 784 (3). "It is ... essential that the materiality of the testimony alleged to ... have been false should be made to appear in the ... indictment." Broadwater v. State, 10 Ga.App ... 458 (5), 73 S.E. 691. See, also, Askew v. State, 3 ... Ga.App. 79 (1), ... ...
  • Ruff v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • November 4, 1915

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT