Ruiz v. Fribourg

• Decision Date: 13 December 2022
• Docket Number: S-22-0085
• Parties: Brett L. RUIZ, Appellant (Respondent), v. Phoenix A. FRIBOURG, Appellee (Plaintiff).
• Court: Wyoming Supreme Court

521 P.3d 329

Brett L. RUIZ, Appellant (Respondent),

v.Phoenix A. FRIBOURG, Appellee (Plaintiff).

S-22-0085

Supreme Court of Wyoming.

December 13, 2022

Representing Appellant: Eric E. Jones, Eric E. Jones, P.C., Wheatland, Wyoming.

Representing Appellee: Devon P. O'Connell and Paige J. Anderson of Pence and Macmillan, LLC, Laramie, Wyoming.

Before FOX, C.J., and KAUTZ, BOOMGAARDEN, GRAY and FENN, JJ.

FENN, Justice.

[¶1] Brett L. Ruiz appeals the district court's order relinquishing jurisdiction over a child custody dispute to Texas pursuant to Wyoming Statute § 20-5-307 (LexisNexis 2022). He argues the district court abused its discretion when it found Wyoming was an inconvenient forum, and he contends the procedure used in this case violated his right to due process. We affirm.

ISSUES

[¶2] Mr. Ruiz presents two issues on appeal. We rephrase the issues as follows:

I. Did the district court abuse its discretion when it found Wyoming was an inconvenient forum and relinquished jurisdiction to Texas pursuant to the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act?

II. Did the district court deny Father his due process rights when it entered the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act order without requiring the parties to file written pleadings in Wyoming?

FACTS

[¶3] The facts surrounding this appeal span several years. Phoenix Fribourg (Mother) and Brett L. Ruiz (Father) were never married, but they are the parents of one child, EDR, born in January 2017. Less than a week after EDR's birth, Mother filed a petition to establish paternity, custody, and child support. In July 2017, Mother moved to Texas due to her father's failing health. In October of 2017, Mother notified the district court the move was permanent. In January of 2018, the district court held a trial on the petition to establish paternity. The district court subsequently entered an order establishing Father's paternity of EDR and awarding Mother primary custody of the child subject to Father's visitation rights.

[¶4] In January of 2019, Mother filed a petition to modify custody in Texas and asked that the matter be transferred to Texas. The Wyoming district court held a Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) conference with the 45^th Civil District Court, in Bexar County, Texas, pursuant to Wyoming Statute § 20-5-210 (LexisNexis 2019). Both courts agreed Wyoming maintained continuing jurisdiction under Wyoming Statute § 20-5-302 (LexisNexis 2019), and Wyoming was not an inconvenient forum under Wyoming Statute § 20-5-307 (LexisNexis 2019). The district court denied Mother's request.

[¶5] Over the course of the next two years, both Mother and Father filed order to show cause petitions, which were resolved through a Stipulated Order on Motions for Order to Show Cause (Stipulated Order ). Paragraph five of the Stipulated Order stated: "[t]his order shall not prevent any court from considering a change of venue/jurisdiction if appropriate under the UCCJEA." Additionally, the Stipulated Order stated: "[i]f Father violates this Stipulated Order or if there is a material change in circumstance, Mother may petition that the case be transferred to Texas." The Stipulated Order also required both parents to participate in "parent facilitation" with EDR's counselor.

[¶6] In December 2021, four years after Mother and EDR moved to Texas, Mother petitioned the district court in Texas to modify visitation and compel Father's participation in parenting facilitation. Mother did not file a pleading in the Wyoming case asking the district court to relinquish jurisdiction. After receiving Mother's petition, the Texas court contacted the Wyoming court to set another UCCJEA hearing to discuss the issue of jurisdiction. Both parties were present for the hearing and represented by counsel, and both parties testified and made arguments regarding which state presented a more convenient forum.

[¶7] During the hearing, Mother argued Wyoming was now an inconvenient forum. Mother presented evidence EDR went to school in Texas, attended therapy in Texas, had a pediatrician and dentist in Texas, had maternal grandparents who reside in Texas, and had friends in Texas. Mother also argued Father had acquiesced to Texas having jurisdiction by violating the Stipulated Order . Specifically, she alleged Father failed to participate in parenting facilitation.

[¶8] Father argued Wyoming had continuing and exclusive jurisdiction. Father also argued the district court could not transfer jurisdiction to Texas unless Mother showed the child did not have a significant connection with Wyoming, and substantial evidence concerning the child's care, protection, training, and personal relationships was no longer available in Wyoming. Father asserted EDR still had significant connections to Wyoming. Father presented evidence EDR had a close relationship with her paternal grandparents who live in Wyoming, had other extended family in Wyoming, and had friends at a preschool she attended in Wyoming. Father admitted EDR did not have a dentist or medical provider in Wyoming, and he had not attended parenting facilitation.

[¶9] Following arguments from both parties, the two district court judges participated in an off-record discussion about which state presented a more convenient forum. Following this discussion, the Wyoming court determined Wyoming was an inconvenient forum and entered an order relinquishing jurisdiction to Texas in January 2022. Father timely appealed.

DISCUSSION

I. Did the district court abuse its discretion when it held Wyoming was an inconvenient forum and relinquished jurisdiction to Texas?

[¶10] "In child custody proceedings, ‘the determination of whether to exercise jurisdiction or to defer to the courts of another state is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.’ " Pokrovskaya v. Van Genderen, 2021 WY 68, ¶ 7, 487 P.3d 228, 230 (Wyo. 2021) (quoting Symington v. Symington, 2007 WY 154, ¶ 7, 167 P.3d 658, 659 (Wyo. 2007) ). " ‘If the record includes sufficient evidence to support the district court's exercise of discretion, we will defer to that court and affirm its decision’ on inconvenient forum." Id. (quoting Symington , ¶ 7, 167 P. 3d at 659 ).

[¶11] When a court of this state makes an initial custody decision, it has continuing subject matter jurisdiction to enforce or modify the order subject to the provisions of the UCCJEA. See Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 20-2-203(a) (LexisNexis 2021). The UCCJEA was adopted by the Wyoming legislature in 2005 and controls jurisdiction over child custody and visitation disputes. Pokrovskaya, ¶ 10, 487 P.3d at 230 (citing In re NC , 2013 WY 2, ¶ 25, 294 P.3d 866, 873 (Wyo. 2013) ; Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 20-5-201 ). "It codifies both the common law doctrine of forum non conveniens as it relates to child custody and the court's continuing subject matter jurisdiction to enforce or modify its original decrees." Id. (citing Wyo. Stat. Ann. §§ 20-5-307, 20-2-203(a) (LexisNexis 2019)). Under Wyoming Statute § 20-5-302(a), a district court that made the initial child custody determination maintains exclusive, continuing jurisdiction over that case until the following conditions occur:

(i) A court of this state determines that the child, the child's parents and any person acting as a parent do not have significant connection with this state and that substantial evidence is no longer available in this state concerning the child's care, protection, training and personal relationships; or

(ii) A court of this state or a court of another state determines that the child, the child's parents and any person acting as a parent do not presently reside in this state.

However, when those conditions have not occurred and the district court has exclusive, continuing jurisdiction, Wyoming Statute § 20-5-307(a) allows the district court to decline to exercise that jurisdiction at any time based on the doctrine of forum non conveniens:

A court of this state which has jurisdiction under this act to make a child custody determination may decline to exercise its jurisdiction at any time if it determines that it is an inconvenient forum under the circumstances and that a court of another state is a more appropriate forum. The issue of inconvenient forum may be raised upon motion of a party, the court's own motion, or request of another court.

See also Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 20-2-203(a) (allowing a court that has jurisdiction to modify or enforce an order to decline to exercise its jurisdiction if it finds it is an inconvenient forum).

[¶12] Father argues once the district court decides it has exclusive, continuing jurisdiction under Wyoming Statute § 20-5-302, it must conclude it is unable to transfer jurisdiction to another forum. He asserts Wyoming Statute § 20-5-302 "is in conflict with" Wyoming Statute § 20-5-307, and a district court can only decline jurisdiction if the requirements of § 20-5-302(a) are met. Father's argument is contrary to the plain language of the UCCJEA, and we have previously rejected this argument. See Pokrovskaya, 2021 WY 68, ¶ 7, 487 P.3d at 230 ; Symington, 2007 WY 154, ¶ 7, 167 P.3d at 659 ; Prickett v. Prickett , 2007 WY 153, ¶ 10, 167 P.3d 661, 663 (Wyo. 2007).

[¶13] "We ‘consider all statutes relating to the same subject or having the same general purpose and strive to interpret them harmoniously.’ And we ‘will not interpret a statute in a way that renders any portion meaningless or in a manner producing absurd results.’ " MSC v. MCG , 2019 WY 59, ¶ 19, 442 P.3d 662, 668 (Wyo. 2019) (internal citations omitted) (quoting Int'l Ass'n of Fire Fighters Local Union No. 5058 v. Gillette/Wright/Campbell Cty. Fire Prot. Joint Powers Bd ., 2018 WY 75, ¶ 34, 421 P.3d 1059, 1067 (Wyo. 2018) ). If we interpreted the UCCJEA in the manner suggested by Father, it would render Wyoming Statute § 20-5-307 meaningless. We have previously recognized these statutory provisions can be read in harmony:

Because the [custody order] originated in Wyoming, the

...