Ruiz v. Peralta

• Decision Date: 19 June 2003
• Citation: 306 A.D.2d 150,760 N.Y.S.2d 324
• Parties: ANGEL RUIZ, Respondent,<BR>v.<BR>ALEXANDRA PERALTA et al., Defendants,<BR>WELSBACH ELECTRIC CORP., Appellant, and CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents.
• Court: New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

306 A.D.2d 150

760 N.Y.S.2d 324

ANGEL RUIZ, Respondent,

v. ALEXANDRA PERALTA et al., Defendants,WELSBACH ELECTRIC CORP., Appellant, and CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents.

Decided June 19, 2003.

Concur — Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Ellerin, Williams and Marlow, JJ.

The evidence of multiple repairs on the subject traffic light performed by appellant in the eight months before the accident warrants denial of its motion for summary judgment without prejudice to renewal upon completion of disclosure (CPLR 3212 [f]; Ludwig v Welsbach Elec. Corp., 305 AD2d 124 [2003]).