Russell v. Martin
Decision Date | 01 March 1919 |
Citation | 232 Mass. 379 |
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Parties | LEROY P. RUSSELL v. SARKIS MARTIN & trustee. |
January 22, 1919.
Present: RUGG, C.
J., LORING, BRALEY CROSBY, & CARROLL, JJ.
Sale, Conditional. Election.
Where under a contract of conditional sale of a chattel the price, which is a round sum, is payable in instalments, the first in cash and the others represented by seven promissory notes, and the title is not to pass until the last note is paid, if the buyer defaults on the cash payment by failing to make good a check which he has given for it and also fails to pay the first four notes as they fall due, and thereupon the seller brings an action of replevin for the chattel, he has elected to disaffirm the sale and he then or thereafter cannot maintain an action of contract on the check and the overdue notes.
CONTRACT on a check of the defendant dated March 23, 1917, for $50.50 and on four promissory notes, each for $50, payable respectively on April 8, May 8, June 8 and July 8, 1917. Writ in the First District Court of Essex dated July 11, 1917.
On appeal to the Superior Court the case was tried before Dana, J. The evidence is described in the opinion. The check and notes sued upon were given under a contract of conditional sale of a motor truck, which was as follows:
The plaintiff brought an action of replevin for the motor truck, as stated in the opinion. The date of the writ of replevin was July 11 1917, the same as the date of the writ in this action. If material to the determination of this case, it was agreed, that the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Maestro Music, Inc. v. Rudolph Wurlitzer Co.
...the security or asserting his contractual rights. Baer v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 101 Fla. 913, 132 So. 817; Russell v. Martin, 232 Mass. 379, 122 N.E. 447; State Bank of Black Diamond v. Johnson, 104 Wash. 550, 177 P. 340, 3 A.L.R. 235; Beck v. Shepherd Fruit Co., 19 Cal.App.2d 59......
-
Associates Discount Corp. v. C.E. Fay Co.
...Corp., 271 Mass. 285, 290, 171 N.E. 643;Handy v. C. I. T. Corp., 291 Mass. 157, 160, 197 N.E. 64, 101 A.L.R. 447. See Russell v. Martin, 232 Mass. 379, 122 N.E. 447. The name ‘trust receipt,’ given to the transaction, is a misnomer, for Grannone held no title for the benefit of the plaintif......
-
Gardner v. Buckley & Scott, Inc.
...unless' recorded as therein indicated. Even if it be assumed that the ‘rental agreement’ be a conditional sale (see Russell v. Martin, 232 Mass. 379, 382, 122 N. E. 447), and this equipment be ‘articles of personal property’ of the same kind or of the same general description as ‘heating ap......
-
Boland v. Essex County Bank and Trust Company, Civ. A. No. 72-3299-G
...action to recover the purchase price or any part of it remaining unpaid, absent a special provision in the contract. Russell v. Martin, 1919, 232 Mass. 379, 122 N.E. 447. The statute apparently effected similar changes in the law of Connecticut. There repossession was allowed when specifica......