Russell v. Tillotson

Decision Date24 October 1885
CitationRussell v. Tillotson, 140 Mass. 201, 4 N. E. 231 (Mass. 1885)
PartiesRUSSELL v. TILLOTSON and others.
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

This was an action of tort for personal injuries. The material facts appear in the opinion.G.M. Stearns, for plaintiff.

E.M. Wood, for defendant.

HOLMES, J.

The plaintiff seeks to recover for damage to his person, caused while employed in the defendant's mill, by his apron and jacket catching on a revolving shaft while he was standing on a ladder and replacing a board upon a belt-box, into which the shaft ran at right angles. The shaft was plainly visible, and was seen by the plaintiff. If the ladder had been placed on the opposite side of the box, there would have been no danger. The plaintiff could have moved the ladder. But, according to his testimony, it was standing where he mounted it at the time when he was ordered by the “boss” to go up and nail the board on, and the plaintiff, although he had worked in mills for a long time, and was acting within the scope of the duties which he had undertaken, did not know any better way to do the work than that which he took. The court below directed a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff excepts, and contends that he was sent into a concealed danger without due warning or instruction.

The exception must be overruled. The plaintiff does not pretend that he was ignorant of the danger of a revolving shaft, nor that the order to him carried any prohibition to put the ladder...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
18 cases
  • Lee v. Missouri Pacific Railway Company
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 30, 1906
    ... ... C. A. 661; Coal Co. v. Reid, 29 ... C. C. A. 475; McCain v. Railroad, 22 C. C. A. 99; ... Gleason v. Railroad, 19 C. C. A. 636; Russell v ... Tillotson, 140 Mass. 201. (6) There was no evidence of ... negligence on the part of the defendant. The simple fact that ... the guardrail ... ...
  • Gilbert v. Burlington, C. R. & N. Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • March 24, 1904
    ...C.C.A. 190, 200; Coal Co. v. Reid, 85 F. 914, 29 C.C.A. 475; McCain v. Railroad Co., 76 F. 125, 126, 22 C.C.A. 99, 101; Russell v. Tillotson, 140 Mass. 201, 4 N.E. 231; Gleason v. Railway Co., 73 F. 647, 19 C.C.A. Cunningham v. Railway Co. (C.C.) 17 F. 882; English v. Railway Co. (C.C.) 24 ......
  • Hickey v. Rio Grande Western Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • Utah Supreme Court
    • July 11, 1905
    ... ... Co., 114 F. 872; Cunningham v. Ry. Co., 17 F ... 882; Jackson v. Crilly, 26 P. 331; Carrier v. U ... P. Ry. Co., 59 P. 1075; Russell v. Tillotson, 140 Mass ... The ... position which the plaintiff took behind his dray, under the ... circumstances, was an obviously ... ...
  • Rogers v. Tegarden Packing Company
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • November 5, 1914
    ... ... Railway Co., 114 F. 870; Gilbert v ... Railway Co., 128 F. 529; Morris v. Duluth, [185 ... Mo.App. 110] etc. Ry. Co., 108 F. 747; Russell ... v. Tillotson, 140 Mass. 201, 4 N.E. 231; Carrier v ... Railway Co., 61 Kan. 447, 59 P. 1075; and Loranger ... v. Railway Co., 104 Mich. 80, ... ...
  • Get Started for Free