Russey v. State, CR

Decision Date18 December 1995
Docket NumberNo. CR,CR
Citation912 S.W.2d 420,322 Ark. 786
PartiesIra RUSSEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee. 95-867.
CourtArkansas Supreme Court

William R. Simpson, Public Defender, Bret Qualls, Deputy Public Defender, C. Joseph Cordi, Jr., Little Rock, for appellant.

Kent G. Holt, Asst. Attorney General, Little Rock, for appellee.

GLAZE, Justice.

Appellant Ira Russey was convicted by a jury of first degree murder of his wife and sentenced to forty years imprisonment. His sole point for reversal is that the trial court abused its discretion by allowing into evidence a police officer's testimony regarding a domestic violence incident which occurred between Ira and his wife, Diane, before the date he shot and killed her.

The state's evidence showed that, sometime in April of 1994, Diane left Ira, and moved into her mother's, Ruby Irvin's, house. Ira had professed his love for Diane, and wanted her to return to him. On June 2, 1994, Ira observed Diane in a car with a man named "Greg," and later that same day, Ira waited for Diane at Diane's mother's house. Diane arrived in her mother's car and an argument ensued between her and Ira. Diane fled back into the car where Ira broke the windows and hit Diane in the face, causing her to be taken to the hospital. On the morning of June 3, Diane swore out a warrant for Ira's arrest.

The state also presented testimony by other witnesses, Diane's grandmother, Mozella Ward, and Margaret Thomas, that Ira had said nobody else could have Diane and that he was going to kill her. In fact, both the state and Ira agree that, early on the morning of June 5, 1994, Ira took his loaded shotgun to Mrs. Irvin's house and confronted Diane about her having been with Greg. Ira testified that he had not intended to shoot Diane, but when she said, "Don't you worry about what me and Greg were doing," he said, "My mind snapped--I went to throw the shotgun and that's how I shot her in the arm." Ira further related the shot "blew out the bottom part of her arm," and then he left the scene. Diane was hospitalized, but died on June 18, 1994. At trial, Ira claimed the shooting was accidental.

The state also called Detective Lawrence Welborn as a witness to testify concerning a disturbance call which had taken place on April 27, 1994--thirty-nine days prior to the June 5 shooting. Over Ira's objection, the trial court permitted Welborn to testify that, when he responded to the April 27 disturbance call at the Russey's residence, he had observed a loaded shotgun lying on a bed, and he unloaded it and returned it to Ira. Diane gathered her clothes and left the house. During his direct examination, Welborn was shown the shotgun Ira used in shooting his wife,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Atwood v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • September 24, 2020
    ...of mistake or accident because he was not charged with alleged violence toward Michelle or Archer. Relying on Russey v. State, 322 Ark. 786, 788-89, 912 S.W.2d 420, 421-22 (1995), and Tate v. State, 367 Ark. 576, 580, 242 S.W.3d 254, 258 (2006), Atwood contends that the evidence at issue wa......
  • Barrett v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • September 25, 2003
    ...of discretion. Smith v. State, 351 Ark. 468, 95 S.W.3d 801 (2003). With respect to Rule 404(b), we believe the case of Russey v. State, 322 Ark. 786, 912 S.W.2d 420 (1995), to be particularly instructive. In that case the defendant was charged with murdering his wife by shooting her with a ......
  • Greene v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • February 1, 2001
    ...that intent must usually be inferred from the circumstances surrounding the killing. See Willett v. State, supra; Russey v. State, 322 Ark. 786, 912S.W.2d 420 (1995). Dr. Malak testified that Burnett was alive when his hands and feet were tied, when he was kicked and stabbed, when he was sh......
  • Tate v. Pate
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • November 2, 2006
    ...not substantially similar to the crime charged, and cites Barrett v. State, 354 Ark. 187, 119 S.W.3d 485 (2003), and Russey v. State, 322 Ark. 786, 912 S.W.2d 420 (1995), in support of that argument. In Barrett, we held that the defendant's physical assault on the same victim approximately ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT