Rutherford, Mulhall & Wargo, P.A. v. Antidormi, 97-1143
| Decision Date | 25 June 1997 |
| Docket Number | No. 97-1143,97-1143 |
| Citation | 695 So.2d 1300 |
| Parties | 22 Fla. L. Weekly D1532 RUTHERFORD, MULHALL & WARGO, P.A., Petitioner, v. Allen ANTIDORMI, Respondent. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
John T. Mulhall III and Nicole Caruso Seropian of Rutherford, Mulhall & Wargo, P.A., Boca Raton, pro se.
Andrew K. Fein of Bloch & Minerley, P.L., Boca Raton, for respondent.
The law firm of Rutherford, Mulhall & Wargo, P.A. imposed a retaining lien on its office file for a former client who disputed the fee charged. The firm seeks common law certiorari review of an order that requires it to turn over the file to the client before the fee is paid. Because the firm has no adequate remedy on appeal and would be irreparably harmed if it were to lose its lien, we grant certiorari review.
Absent exceptional circumstances that are not present in this case, it is a departure from the essential requirements of the law for a court to disregard a retaining lien and release a client's file before the fee dispute has been resolved. Andrew Hall & Assocs. v. Ghanem, 679 So.2d 60 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Wintter v. Fabber, 618 So.2d 375 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). Accordingly, we grant the writ of certiorari and quash the order that releases the file. On remand, if the trial court finds that a fee is due, it should not order the file turned over until after it has made provision for payment or posting of adequate security.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Alessi Family Ltd. P'ship v. Centurion Dev., LLC (In re Alessi Family Ltd. P'ship)
...without adequate security because there was no determination that retaining lien was invalid); Rutherford, Mulhall & Wargo, P.A. v. Antidormi , 695 So.2d 1300, 1301 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (quashing order for law firm to release its file to former client before determining whether the fee was d......
-
Kerrigan, Estess, Rankin & McLeod v. State
...harm because there may be no other way to secure counsels' claims for fees and costs. See generally Rutherford, Mulhall & Wargo, P.A. v. Antidormi, 695 So.2d 1300 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (granting certiorari review as to order disregarding law firm's retaining lien in client's file). Because we......
-
Fingar v. Braun and May Realty, Inc.
...attorney to deliver the file to the client before the fee is paid. See Andrew Hall, 679 So.2d at 62; Rutherford, Mulhall & Wargo, P.A. v. Antidormi, 695 So.2d 1300, 1301 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); Wintter v. Fabber, 618 So.2d 375, 376-77 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). The value of the retaining lien lies "......
-
Shelowitz, Shelowitz, Terrell v. Peters
...4th DCA 1996). The order on review is capable of causing irreparable harm to the firm's retaining lien. Rutherford, Mulhall & Wargo, P.A. v. Antidormi, 695 So.2d 1300 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Accordingly, the petition is granted and the order is hereby Petition Granted. POLEN, FARMER and KLEIN,......
-
Lien cases
...contents could do. Rathburn v. Policastro , 703 So.2d 537 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). See also Rutherford, Mulhall & Wargo, P.A., v. Antidormi , 695 So.2d 1300, 1301 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); Wintter v. Fabber , 618 So.2d 375, 376 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). The right to retain the papers is valuable to the a......