Rutter v. Janis

Decision Date06 June 2018
CourtConnecticut Supreme Court
Parties Casey Leigh RUTTER v. Adam JANIS et al. Nancy Beale, Administratrix (Estate of Lindsey Beale) v. Luis Martins et al. Jason Ferreira v. Luis Martins et al.

The plaintiffs' petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 180 Conn.App. 1, 182 A.3d 85 (2018), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude, under the circumstances of this case, that the thirty day loan period of General Statutes § 14-60 did not, as a matter of law, include the first day of the loan period?"

KAHN and ECKER, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Rutter v. Janis
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • February 25, 2020
    ...whether the Appellate Court correctly excluded the date of the loan when calculating the thirty day loan period. See Rutter v. Janis , 329 Conn. 904, 185 A.3d 594 (2018).We agree with the Appellate Court that the day of the loan does not count toward the thirty day limitation period of § 14......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT