Ryan v. State
| Decision Date | 27 June 1963 |
| Citation | Ryan v. State, 242 N.Y.S.2d 192, 19 A.D.2d 696 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963) |
| Parties | Daniel E. RYAN, as Administrator with Limited Letters of the Estate of Rita Nantel, Appellant, v. The STATE of New York, Respondent. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
John R. Cummins, Plattsburgh, for claimant-appellant.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen., Albany, for respondent Jean M. Coon.
Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. 13 Misc.2d 282, 177 N.Y.S.2d 922.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
4 cases
-
Jacques v. Village of Lake Placid
...injury. (Cunningham v. City of Niagara Falls, Supra; Ryan v. State of New York, 13 Misc.2d 282, 177 N.Y.S.2d 922, affd. 19 A.D.2d 696, 242 N.Y.S.2d 192; see also Restatement, Torts 2d, § 333 Et seq.) On this record, it was error to submit the question of whether plaintiff was an invitee or ......
-
Velez v. City of New York
...defendant's duty to them was the same and was defined in Ryan v. State of New York (13 Misc.2d 282, 177 N.Y.S.2d 922, affd. 19 A.D.2d 696, 242 N.Y.S.2d 192). in Ryan, the Court of Claims dismissed a case which was factually analogous to that at bar, holding that, since the plaintiff and his......
-
Viall v. State
...to the accident, afford a basis for recovery. (See Ryan v. State of New York, 13 Misc.2d 282, 286, 177 N.Y.S.2d 922, 925; affd. 19 A.D.2d 696, 242 N.Y.S.2d 192.) Judgment affirmed, without ...
- Renn v. Eano