Ryan v. State
Decision Date | 05 May 1989 |
Docket Number | No. A89A0895,A89A0895 |
Citation | 191 Ga.App. 477,382 S.E.2d 196 |
Parties | RYAN v. The STATE. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Lewis R. Slaton, Dist. Atty., Benjamin H. Oehlert III, Nancy A. Grace, Keith L. Lindsay, Joseph J. Drolet, Asst. Dist. Attys., for appellee.
Ryan was convicted of armed robbery, theft by taking, unlawful possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony (armed robbery), and kidnapping. Following the denial of his motion for a new trial, Ryan appealed. Held:
1. The facts of this case are set forth in Giddens v. State, 190 Ga.App. 723, [380 S.E.2d 274 (1989) , in which the conviction of Ryan's co-defendant, Giddens, was affirmed. Viewing the facts in a light favorable to the verdict, we find them sufficient to enable a rational trier of fact to determine that Ryan committed armed robbery, theft by taking, unlawful possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony (armed robbery), and kidnapping beyond a reasonable doubt. See Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 [1979].
2. Ryan contends the trial court erred in charging and recharging (almost verbatim) the jury as follows:
The charge was adjusted to the evidence. It was not erroneous. Helton v. State, 166 Ga.App. 662, 663(1), 305 S.E.2d 592 (1983).
Judgment affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial- Weems v. State
-
Ryan v. Thomas
...and a third attorney from this office represented him on direct appeal. Following the affirmance of his appeal, Ryan v. State, 191 Ga.App. 477, 382 S.E.2d 196 (1989), Ryan filed a pro se habeas corpus petition, maintaining that his trial counsel had rendered ineffective assistance. At the h......
- Huff v. State, A89A0725
-
Clark v. State, No. A05A2336.
...have previously affirmed the use of this charge in a case in which the kidnapping victim was transported in a car. Ryan v. State, 191 Ga.App. 477(2), 382 S.E.2d 196 (1989). Further, Clark has not shown how this charge could have contributed to the verdict against him, as the evidence showed......