Rymed Techs., LLC v. KIG, LLC

• Decision Date: 01 April 2020
• Docket Number: No. 3D19-574,No. 3D19-575,3D19-575,3D19-574
• Parties: Rymed Technologies, LLC, et al., Appellants, v. KIG, LLC, et al., Appellees.
• Court: Florida District Court of Appeals

Rymed Technologies, LLC, et al., Appellants,
v.
KIG, LLC, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D19-575
No. 3D19-574

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

April 1, 2020

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Lower Tribunal No. 15-875-K

Appeals from non-final orders the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Luis M. Garcia, Judge.

Hershoff Lupino & Yagel, LLP and Russell A. Yagel; Shendell & Pollock, P.L. and Diran V. Seropian and Zachary R. Needell (Boca Raton), for appellants.

Zarco Einhorn Salkowski & Brito, P.A., and Robert Zarco and Alaina B. Karsten and Brenda Phang, for appellees.

Before EMAS, C.J., and LINDSEY and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Page 2

Affirmed. See Purdue v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 259 So. 3d 918, 921 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018) ("[C]laim that [movant] did not receive the master dismissal order is generally cognizable under rule 1.540(b)(1)."); John Deere Const. & Forestry Co. v. Lorelys Elec. Corp., 69 So. 3d 1099, 1100 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (affirming rule 1.540(b)(2) relief where record showed court could have granted identical relief under 1.540(b)(1)); Okeechobee Imps., Inc. v. Am. Sav. & Loan Ass'n of Fla., 558 So. 2d 506, 507 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (rule 1.540(b)(1) relief granted where complaint became lost by being accidentally placed in non-litigation related file dealing with same subject); Carter, Hawley, Hale Stores, Inc. v. Whitman, 516 So. 2d 83, 83-84 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)...