E.S. v. State
| Decision Date | 05 June 2013 |
| Docket Number | No. CV-13-99,CV-13-99 |
| Parties | E.S. APPELLANT v. STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE |
| Court | Arkansas Court of Appeals |
WESTERN DISTRICT
AFFIRMED
E.S. appeals from an adjudication of delinquency by the Juvenile Division of the Circuit Court of Craighead County on a finding that she was an accomplice to the crime of disorderly conduct. She challenges the sufficiency of the evidence used to adjudicate her as a delinquent. We find no error, and we affirm.
Appellant was one in a group of four females involved in an extended altercation with Lakeshia Williams and her two daughters. Ms. Williams testified at the hearing that appellant and three other girls came to her home and confronted her daughters. This was part of an ongoing dispute. Ms. Williams testified that the verbal dispute became physical, and one of the four females sprayed mace. E.S. and the three girls ran to the car and drove away. Ms. Williams and her daughters followed the group, and a second confrontation occurred.Ms. Williams testified that during this second altercation, appellant sprayed mace. Appellant denied being involved in the altercation or spraying mace.
The State charged appellant with disorderly conduct. A bench trial was held, and at the close of the State's case, appellant moved for a directed verdict. At the close of her case, she renewed her motion. She was adjudicated delinquent for being an accomplice to the crime of disorderly conduct. Her disposition included supervised probation, forty hours of public service, thirty days in juvenile detention with twenty-nine suspended with one to serve and one already served, an 8:00 p.m. curfew, $35 in court costs, $36 drug-testing fee, $20 per month probation fee, and an assessment for outpatient counseling. She was also to have no contact with certain named individuals. She brings this appeal challenging the sufficiency of the evidence.
A motion for directed verdict is a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. K.A.S. v. State, 2013 Ark. App. 236, at 2. In juvenile cases, the sufficiency-of-the-evidence standard is the same as the one used in criminal cases. Id. The adjudication will be upheld if substantial evidence exists to support it. Id. Substantial evidence is evidence that is of sufficient force and character to compel reasonable minds to a conclusion without reliance on speculation or conjecture. Id. On appeal, evidence is considered in the light most favorable to the State, and only evidence supporting the verdict is considered. Id. The appellate court does not weigh the credibility of the witnesses; that is for the fact-finder. Id.
Arkansas Code Annotated section 5-71-207 (Supp. 2011) states that a person commits the offense of disorderly conduct if, with the purpose to cause public inconvenience,annoyance, or alarm, he or she engages in fighting or in violent, threatening or tumultuous behavior. Arkansas Code Annotated section 5-2-403 (Repl. 2006) states that a person is an accomplice of another person in the commission of an offense if, with the purpose of promoting or facilitating the commission of an offense, the person solicits, advises, encourages, or coerces the other person to commit the offense.
Appellant contended that she did not know that the three other girls with whom she was riding in the car were going to...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
K.B. v. State
...the same as it would be in a criminal case. E.g., A.D. v. State, 2015 Ark. App. 35, at 4, 453 S.W.3d 696, 698 (citing E.S. v. State, 2013 Ark. App. 378, 2013 WL 2445213 ). A motion to dismiss made during an adjudication proceeding is a challenge to the sufficiency of the State's evidence. E......
-
A.D. v. State
...is the same as it would be in a criminal case, that is, whether the adjudication is supported by substantial evidence. E.S. v. State, 2013 Ark. App. 378, 2013 WL 2445213. Substantial evidence is evidence, direct or circumstantial, that is of sufficient force and character to compel a conclu......