Sachs v. Stripling
| Decision Date | 05 September 1962 |
| Citation | 236 N.Y.S.2d 524,36 Misc.2d 813 |
| Parties | Delores SACHS and Edward R. Sachs, Plaintiffs, v. Isaac C. STRIPLING and Zion Wimberly, defendants. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court |
Ainsworth, Sullivan, Tracy & Knauf, Albany (Robert K. Ruslander, Albany, of counsel), for defendants, in support of application.
Martin Brickman, Albany, for plaintiffs, in opposition.
Defendants move for an order 'directing plaintiffs to answer questions presented to them and to submit to further questioning with respect to the production of the United States and New York State Income Tax returns for the years 1959 and 1960, and to produce said United States and New York State Income Tax returns for the years 1959 and 1960.' It appears that the attorneys for defendants (then therein identified as attorneys for defendant Wimberly) served a notice of examination before trial upon the attorney for plaintiffs, said notice, among other things, asking for the production of federal and state income tax returns for the years 1959 and 1960. There is nothing from which it might appear that an application was made to vacate or modifysaid notice. Plaintiff Edward R. Sachs was examined and, on advice of counsel, refused to answer questions as to his salary as reported in his 1959 and 1960 tax returns.
It further appears that this matter arises out of an automobile collision which took place on August 26, 1961, that plaintiff Edward R. Sachs claims loss of earnings, that on examination said plaintiff testified in substance that he is President of the corporation which paid him a salary prior to and subsequent to the accident in question and that it was his responsibility to prepare the payroll book for said corporation.
Under the circumstances shown herein, it seems proper to grant the application in regard to the plaintiff Edward R. Sachs. See: Elmer v. Byrd, 32 Misc.2d 408, 220 N.Y.S.2d 985, affd. 16 A.D.2d 744, 227 N.Y.S.2d 248, and cases cited therein; also Schacht v. Schacht, Dom.Rel.Ct. 58 N.Y.S.2d 54, 62. See also: McCullough v. Auditore, 215 App.Div. 89, 212 N.Y.S. 628.
Submit order.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Coleman v. Myers
...408, 220 N.Y.S.2d 985, affd. 16 A.D.2d 744, 227 N.Y.S.2d 248; Rosenblum v. Rosenblum, 21 A.D.2d 682, 249 N.Y.S.2d 918; Sachs v. Stripling, 36 Misc.2d 813, 236 N.Y.S.2d 524; Holihan v. Regina Corp., 54 Misc.2d 264, 282 N.Y.S.2d 404; Altman v. City of New York, 46 Misc.2d 133). In DiBiasso v.......
- Local 1199, Drug and Hospital Emp. Union, AFL-CIO, v. Mahs Drug Co.
-
Bauer v. Huber
...744, 227 N.Y.S.2d 236 (4th Dept.1962), or was the corporate officer responsible for preparing the payroll records. Sachs v. Stripling, 36 Misc.2d 813, 236 N.Y.S.2d 524 (Sup.Ct. Albany Co.1962) (Cooke, J.). This rule is based upon the obvious reasoning that such plaintiffs' employment record......