Sage Realty Corp. v. Kenbee Management-New York, Inc.
| Decision Date | 14 April 1992 |
| Docket Number | MANAGEMENT-NEW |
| Citation | 182 A.D.2d 480,582 N.Y.S.2d 182 |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
| Parties | SAGE REALTY CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KENBEEYORK, INC. and RW & K Realty, Inc., Defendants-Respondents. |
Before MILONAS, J.P., and ROSENBERGER, KUPFERMAN, ROSS and SMITH, JJ.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Arber, J.), entered on or about October 7, 1991, which denied the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment pending a hearing to determine what efforts were made by the plaintiff to mitigate damages, whether those efforts were reasonable and diligent and the amount of damages to be awarded, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is granted, without costs.
The plaintiff instituted this action to recover damages for the alleged default of the defendant Kenbee Management-New York, Inc. under a commercial lease between the plaintiff, as landlord, and the defendant Kenbee, as lessee. The defendant RW & K Realty, Inc. is the successor in interest to the Kenrich Corporation, which had guaranteed the performance of Kenbee under the lease.
In opposition to the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, the defendants conceded their liability for the breach of the parties' agreements, but contended that the plaintiff failed to mitigate its damages after Kenbee vacated the premises. In reply, the plaintiff maintained that it had attempted to relet the space but that those attempts were unsuccessful. The Supreme Court, concluding that the plaintiff undertook the duty to rerent the premises and, therefore, to mitigate damages, denied the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment pending a hearing to determine what efforts the plaintiff made to rerent the premises, whether those efforts were reasonable and diligent and the amount of damages to be awarded.
The Supreme Court erred in denying the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. This court has repeatedly held that "in a commercial lease the lessor is not under a duty to mitigate damages" (Mitchell & Titus Assocs. v. Mesh Realty Corp., 160 A.D.2d 465, 466, 554 N.Y.S.2d 136 [citing Syndicate Bldg. Corp. v. Lorber, 128 A.D.2d 381, 512 N.Y.S.2d 674]. Moreover, contrary to the conclusion reached by the Supreme Court, the assumption of duty doctrine does not apply to preclude an award of summary judgment to a commercial landlord who voluntarily attempts to mitigate damages.
We have considered the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
In re Durso Supermarkets, Inc.
...real property." Id. See also, In re Ames Department Stores, Inc., 158 B.R. 35 (S.D.N.Y.1993); Sage Realty Corp v. Kenbee Management-New York, Inc., 182 A.D.2d 480, 582 N.Y.S.2d 182 (1st Dept.1992); Rubin v. Dondysh, 153 Misc.2d 657, 588 N.Y.S.2d 504 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1991). Therefore, for purpose......
-
Gotlieb v. Taco Bell Corp.
...terms of the lease, as there is no obligation for a commercial lessor to mitigate damages. See Sage Realty Corp. v. Kenbee Management-New York, Inc., 182 A.D.2d 480, 582 N.Y.S.2d 182 (1992); Mitchell Titus Assocs., Inc. v. Mesh Realty Corp., 160 A.D.2d 465, 554 N.Y.S.2d 136 (1990); Syndicat......
-
In re Andover Togs, Inc.
...Notwithstanding these cases, other courts held fast to the traditional rule. See Sage Realty Corp. v. Kenbee Management-New York Inc., 182 A.D.2d 480, 582 N.Y.S.2d 182 (1st Dept.1992) ("this court has repeatedly held that `in a commercial lease the lessor is not under a duty to mitigate dam......
-
In re The Bennett Funding Group, Inc.
... ... United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York ... October 9, 1997. 220 BR 744 ... See Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Bernstein, 944 F.2d 101, 106 (2d Cir.1991) ... 335, 347 (S.D.N.Y.1986) (citing De West Realty Corp. v. Internal Revenue Service, 418 F.Supp ... ...