Saltmarsh v. Detroit Auto. Inter-Insurance Exchange, INTER-INSURANCE
| Citation | 344 So.2d 862 |
| Decision Date | 01 February 1977 |
| Docket Number | INTER-INSURANCE,No. 75--1822,75--1822 |
| Parties | Albert E. SALTMARSH and Jane E. Saltmarsh, his wife, Appellants, v. DETROIT AUTOMOBILEEXCHANGE, a corporation, appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Harris, Albury & Morgan and James T. Hendrick, Key West, for appellants.
Fowler, White, Burnett, Hurley, Banick & Knight and Fred R. Ober, Miami, Feldman, Eden & Allen and Jeff D. Gautier, Key West, for appellee.
Before HENDRY, C.J., and BARKDULL and HAVERFIELD, JJ.
Plaintiffs appeal an order granting defendant insurer's motion to strike the prayers for punitive damages and emotional distress contained in their complaint.
Plaintiffs, Albert & Jane Saltmarsh, purchased automobile liability insurance from the defendant, Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange, on May 10, 1971. The policy was automatically renewed from year to year. At the end of May 1973 plaintiffs received from Detroit a notice retroactively cancelling their insurance policy as of May 10, 1973. On June 2 Jane was involved in a serious automobile accident. She reported the accident to Detroit and applied for benefits under the PIP and collision provisions of the policy. Detroit denied coverage and plaintiffs filed a complaint seeking the benefits due under their policy. In addition, the complaint contained prayers for damages for mental pain and suffering and punitive damages arising out of Detroit's conduct in cancelling the policy and willfully and wantonly denying benefits to plaintiffs without regard for their rights. Detroit admitted in its answer that the cancellation was unlawful and that full benefits were due and payable, but denied liability for mental pain and suffering. Thereafter, Detroit filed a motion to strike the prayers for mental suffering and punitive damages. After hearing argument, the trial judge found as a matter of law that a cause of action does not exist under Florida law for a claim for punitive damages, emotional distress and/or mental pain and anguish arising out of the manner in which a first party insurance contract is breached in the absence of a battery. The motion was granted and plaintiffs appeal.
Butchikas v. Travelers Indemnity Company, 343 So.2d 816 (Fla.1976) is dispositive of the issues raised in this appeal.
As to the claim for punitive damages, Butchikas holds that to be entitled thereto, the case must be of the class involving deliberate, overt and...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Dunn v. National Sec. Fire and Cas. Co.
...merit the award of punitive damages. Butchikas v. Travelers Indemnity Co., 343 So.2d 816 (Fla.1976); Saltmarsh v. Detroit Auto Inter-Insurance Exchange, 344 So.2d 862 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). The allegations in Dunn's complaint in this case do not rise to this level of malfeasance on the part of......
-
Moore v. United Services Auto. Ass'n
...436 So.2d 997 (5th DCA Fla.1983); Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Smith, 345 So.2d 784 (4th DCA Fla.1977); Saltmarsh v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange, 344 So.2d 862 (3rd DCA Fla.1977); Standard Life Ins. Co. of Indiana v. Veal, 354 So.2d 239 (Miss.1978); Starkville Municipal Separate S......
-
Industrial Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Romer
...was entitled to punitive damages. Butchikas v. Travelers Indemnity Co., 343 So.2d 816 (Fla.1976); Saltmarsh v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange, 344 So.2d 862 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). As I view it, this is a relatively simple case. The plaintiff cannot recover in tort because he has a......
-
Lewis v. Guthartz
...v. Hanna, 323 So.2d 567 (Fla.1975); Masciarelli v. Maco Supply Corp., 224 So.2d 329 (Fla.1969); Saltmarsh v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange, 344 So.2d 862 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Country Club of Miami Corp. v. McDaniel, 310 So.2d 436 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Associated Heavy Equipment S......