Salvaggio v. Barnett, 12401
Decision Date | 17 April 1952 |
Docket Number | No. 12401,12401 |
Citation | 248 S.W.2d 244 |
Parties | SALVAGGIO v. BARNETT et vir. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Tom S. Williams, San Antonio, for appellant.
Cutrer & Cook, Houston, W. Lawrence Cook, Jr., Houston, of counsel, for appellees.
This is a formal habeas corpus proceeding instituted by Mrs. Barnett, joined by her husband, against Lee Salvaggio, her former husband, seeking the custody of her daughter, Judy Suzzan Salvaggio, who was born August 14, 1948, of her former marriage with Mr. Salvaggio. The exclusive custody of the child was awarded to Mr. Salvaggio in the divorce proceedings by the 98th District Court of Travis County. There was no finding by the court in that action that the present Mrs. Barnett was not a fit person to have the custody of her daughter.
After the divorce Mr. Salvaggio moved to Houston and both he and his child lived with his parents until he married his present wife on April 6, 1951. In the meanwhile Mrs. Barnett married her present husband and thereafter instituted this suit in a Civil District Court of Harris County and from the judgment of the court awarding her custody of the child, based upon the finding of changed conditions, Mr. Salvaggio prosecutes this appeal. At his request the court filed conclusions of fact and law. Therefrom it was made to appear that at the time of the divorce Mrs. Barnett's situation, which forced her to work as a waitress in a restaurant in order to support herself, would not admit of the assumption by her of the care of her infant daughter nor permit her to give the child a mother's attention. It further appeared therefrom that since that time Mrs. Barnett has married her present husband and they have established a home and that she has recently become the mother of a son, the half-brother of Judy, and is now situated in all respects so that she can now take over the custody of Judy and lavish upon her all of the attention which a mother's love can inspire.
The court further found:
'Conclusions of Law
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Quiner v. Quiner
...Bond v. Bond, 144 W.Va. 478, 109 S.E.2d 16 (1959); Jackson v. Jackson, 181 Kan. 1, 309 P.2d 705 (1957); Salvaggio v. Barnett, 248 S.W.2d 244 (Tex.Civ.App.1952); Stone v. Stone, 16 Wash.2d 315, 133 P.2d 526 (1934); Commonwealth ex rel. Derr v. Derr, 148 Pa.Super. 511, 25 A.2d 769 (1942); cer......
-
Meredith v. Meredith
...Smith, 61 Ariz. 373, 149 P.2d 683 (1944); Commonwealth ex rel. Derr v. Dree, 148 Pa.Super. 511, 25 A.2d 769 (1942); Salvaggio v. Barnett, 248 S.W.2d 244 (Tex.Civ.App.1952). However, there was competent evidence in the record before us that appellant was guilty of incestuous conduct with an ......
-
Waites v. Waites
...be regarded as entering into this case." 309 P.2d at 712, quoting Denton v. James, 107 Kan. 729, 193 P. 307, 311 (1920). In Salvaggio v. Barnett, 248 S.W.2d 244 (Tex.Civ.App.), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 879, 73 S.Ct. 176, 97 L.Ed. 681 (1952), another Jehovah's Witness case, the court said that......
-
Jackson v. Jackson, 40231
...P.2d 385; Stone v. Stone, 16 Wash.2d 315, 133 P.2d 526; Reynolds v. Rayborn, Tex.Civ.App.1938, 116 S.W.2d 836; and Salvaggio v. Barnett, Tex.Civ.App.1952, 248 S.W.2d 244; 344 U.S. 879, 73 S.Ct. 176, 97 L.Ed. 681; 43 A.L.R.2d The United States Supreme Court denied certiorari in the Salvaggio......