Sampson v. State, 2D01-1445.
| Citation | 793 So.2d 149 |
| Decision Date | 22 August 2001 |
| Docket Number | No. 2D01-1445.,2D01-1445. |
| Parties | Ernest L. SAMPSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Court of Appeal of Florida (US) |
Ernest L. Sampson appeals the summary denial of his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In his motion, Sampson alleged his trial counsel was ineffective and stated five bases upon which he should be granted relief. We affirm the trial court's order as to all but one of the issues without comment. The remaining issue we affirm without prejudice to Sampson's right to file a facially sufficient claim.
The record indicates that Sampson was convicted of felony fleeing to elude, in violation of section 316.1935(2), Florida Statutes (1997), and was sentenced to twelve years in prison. He alleges that the information in his case was defective because it failed to allege each essential element of the crime with which he was charged, and that his counsel was ineffective for failing to file a motion to dismiss the defective information. If what Sampson alleges is true, this could constitute the first prong of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim. See Groff v. State, 390 So.2d 361 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980)
().
Sampson alleged he was prejudiced because if his attorney had moved to dismiss the information, there is a reasonable probability the outcome of his trial would have been different. However, Sampson failed to allege any circumstances which would have prevented the State from simply refiling an amended information which was sufficient. Because Sampson failed to allege a facially sufficient claim, we affirm the trial court's order without prejudice to Sampson's right to file a facially sufficient motion for postconviction relief. See Flagg v. State, 733 So.2d 1118 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)
.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Cox v. Sec'y
...circumstance[s] which would have prevented the State from simply refiling an amended information which was sufficient." Sampson v. State, 793 So. 2d 149, 150 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). Defendant has failed to allege such circumstances; therefore, Ground [Ten] is facially insufficient. In any event......
-
Spera v. State
...defendant files a facially insufficient claim, the trial court has the discretion to permit an amendment. See, e.g., Sampson v. State, 793 So.2d 149, 150 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (holding that the defendant's claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to move to dismiss a defective informatio......
-
Jackson v. State
...motion was facially insufficient and [appellant] failed to meet his burden, we affirm the trial court's order."); Sampson v. State, 793 So. 2d 149, 150 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) ("[Appellant] failed to allege any circumstances which would have prevented the State from simply refiling an amended in......
-
Ferris v. State
...he fails to allege any circumstances under which the state would have been unable to file an amended information. See Sampson v. State, 793 So.2d 149 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (holding that a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to object to defective information was facially ins......