San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. Engelhorn
| Decision Date | 24 October 1900 |
| Citation | 65 S.W. 68 |
| Parties | SAN ANTONIO & A. P. RY. CO. v. ENGELHORN et al.<SMALL><SUP>1</SUP></SMALL> |
| Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
On rehearing. Judgment modified. For former opinion, see 62 S. W. 561.
In reference to the recovery of $500 on behalf of the mother of deceased, we relied on the evidence as it was stated in appellant's brief and acceded to by appellees. Our attention is called by motion to the fact that there was testimony that the mother's age was about 52 years. In view of this, the remittitur required will be fixed at $300, leaving the judgment in this respect $200.
1. Writ of error denied by supreme court.
To continue reading
Request your trial
9 cases
-
Golden v. Spokane & I.E.R. Co.
... ... 239, 50 N.E. 578; Seeley v ... Railway Co., 8 A.D. 402, 40 N.Y.S. 866; Flaherty v ... Railway Co. (R. I.), 35 A. 308; San Antonio etc. Co ... v. Englehorn, 24 Tex. Civ. App. 324, 62 S.W. 561, 65 ... S.W. 68; Atchison etc. Co. v. Van Belle, 26 Tex ... Civ. App. 511, 64 S.W ... ...
-
Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. Butts
...the danger either in fact or as a presumption are: San Antonio & Aransas Pass Ry. Co. v. Engelhorn, 24 Tex. Civ. App. 324, 62 S. W. 561, 65 S. W. 68; G., C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Darby, 28 Tex. Civ. App. 413, 67 S. W. 446; Orange Lumber Co. v. Ellis, 105 Tex. 363, 150 S. W. 582; T. & P. Ry. Co......
-
Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Wylie
...Collins, 24 Tex. Civ. App. 143, 57 S. W. 884, 885 (writ refused); S. A. & A. P. Ry. Co. v. Engelhorn, 24 Tex. Civ. App. 324, 62 S. W. 561, 65 S. W. 68 (writ refused). Appellant's contention that the customs testified by such witness were inadmissible because not pleaded is without merit. Su......
-
Pecos & N. T. Ry. Co. v. Winkler
...contributory negligence. Gallaway v. Railway Co. (Civ. App.) 78 S. W. 32; Railway Co. v. Engelhorn, 24 Tex. Civ. App. 324, 62 S. W. 561, 65 S. W. 68; Railway Co. v. Still (Civ. App.) 100 S. W. 182; 3 Labatt on Master & Servant (2d Ed.) § 1269. This was not a ground of negligence charged aga......
Request a trial to view additional results