San Antonio v. Al Izzi's Motor Sales, Inc.

Decision Date26 April 1972
Docket NumberNo. 1508-A,1508-A
Citation290 A.2d 59,110 R.I. 54
PartiesRalph SAN ANTONIO v. AL IZZI'S MOTOR SALES, INC. ppeal.
CourtRhode Island Supreme Court
OPINION

KELLEHER, Justice.

This is an employer's appeal from a decree of the Workmen's Compensation Commission affirming the trial commissioner's award of compensation benefits to the employee for total and partial incapacity.

Ralph San Antonio is a multi-talented artisan. He can work as a carpenter, a mason, a glazier or a painter. He entered the employ of Al Izzi's Motor Sales, Inc. in January, 1969. The automobile agency is located in West Warwick. Ralph testified that he was hired as a carpenter, cabinetmaker and house builder. Albert N. Izzi, Jr., the agency's president-treasurer and manager, told the trial commissioner that Ralph had been hired to perform general maintenance chores around the business premises. Albert and his brother, William, are the agency's sole stockholders. They, and other members of the Izzi family, are officers and stockholders in several business corporations located in the West Warwick-Coventry area.

The record shows that subsequent to January, 1969, Ralph's talents were used to great advantage by the Izzi family. He exhibited his skills while working at a supermarket, a cleansing plant and various dwellings all owned or leased to others by the Izzi clan. His efforts, wherever they were performed, were compensated by a weekly $200 paycheck issued by the automobile agency.

On September 4, 1969, Ralph was ordered 1 to go to Coventry and there repair a sagging floor in a home owned either by the Izzi brothers or the St. Anthony Realty Company. All of the St. Anthony's stockholders are within the Izzi family circle. The work done by Ralph was arduous. After carrying cement by wheel-barrow from a cement truck to the construction site for about three hours, Ralph began to experience severe pains in his chest. He was taken to Kent County Hospital where he remained for about three weeks. Medical testimony produced before the trial commissioner showed that Ralph had suffered a myocardial infarction which was attributable to his efforts to restore the sagging floor. He was totally incapacitated for some time. Subsequently, he began working at a job that was somewhat less strenuous than when he was on the auto dealer's payroll.

The employer claims that Ralph's incapacity is not compensable because it does not arise out of and in the course of his employment. In making this argument, it points out that Ralph's attack occurred while he was working miles away from the West Warwick headquarters of the automobile agency in a residence whose owner's corporate purposes are totally unrelated to those of Izzi's Motor Sales.

The insurer's emphasis that Ralph's misfortune having occurred while he was working some distance from West Warwick needs little discussion. Compensation benefits are not to be denied an employee simply because his injury occurs off the employer's premises. Tromba v. Harwood Mfg. Co., 94 R.I. 3, 177 A.2d 186 (1962). Rather, compensation is payable once a nexus is established between the injury and the employment. The nexus may be found if the injury occurred within the period of employment at a place where the employee might reasonably have been while he was either fulfilling the duties of his employment or doing something incidental thereto or to conditions under which these duties were to be performed. Montanaro v. Guild Metal Products, Inc., R.I., 275 A.2d 634 (1971).

Ralph's claim brings to mind ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • DeNardo v. Fairmount Foundries Cranston, Inc.
    • United States
    • Rhode Island Supreme Court
    • April 12, 1979
    ...& Co., R.I., 375 A.2d 920 (1977); Knowlton v. Porter Trucking Co., 117 R.I. 28, 362 A.2d 131 (1976); San Antonio v. Al Izzi's Motor Sales, Inc., 110 R.I. 54, 290 A.2d 59 (1972); Chase v. General Electric Co., 83 R.I. 269, 115 A.2d 683 (1955); Remington v. Louttit Laundry Co., 77 R.I. 185, 7......
  • Keene v. Insley
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • May 2, 1975
    ...go with Pritchett and that he told the daughter about his insurance was corroborated by other witnesses.3 San Antonio v. Al Izzi's Motor Sales, Inc., 110 R.I. 54, 290 A.2d 59 (1972) (carpenter working for automobile agency ordered to do maintenance work on boss' private property); Departmen......
  • Dawson v. A & H Mfg. Co., 81-1-A
    • United States
    • Rhode Island Supreme Court
    • August 5, 1983
    ...Co., 117 R.I. at 236, 366 A.2d at 160; (c) while repairing a house owned by the employer's family, San Antonio v. Al Izzi's Motor Sales, Inc., 110 R.I. 54, 56, 290 A.2d 59, 60 (1972); (d) while coming to work, Montanaro v. Guild Metal Products, Inc., 108 R.I. 362, 364-65, 275 A.2d 634, 635 ......
  • Compensation of Anfilofieff, Matter of
    • United States
    • Oregon Court of Appeals
    • May 11, 1981
    ...Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. C., 292 So.2d 747 (La.App.1974); Jackson v. Lawler, 273 So.2d 856 (La.App.1973); San Antonio v. Al Izzi's Motor Sales, 110 R.I. 54, 290 A.2d 59 (1972); Friend v. Industrial Com., 40 Ill.2d 79, 237 N.E.2d 491 (1968); Carroll v. Trans-Dyne Corporation, 22 A.D.2d 739,......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT