San Francisco-Oakland Newspaper Guild v. Tribune Pub. Co.
| Decision Date | 28 February 1969 |
| Docket Number | No. 22385.,22385. |
| Citation | 407 F.2d 1327 |
| Parties | SAN FRANCISCO-OAKLAND NEWSPAPER GUILD, an unincorporated association, Appellant, v. The TRIBUNE PUBLISHING CO., a corporation, Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Irwin Leff (argued), of Darwin, Rosenthal & Leff, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
Harold W. Jewett, Jr. (argued), Oakland, Cal., for appellee.
Before DUNIWAY and ELY, Circuit Judges, and SMITH,* District Judge.
Appellant (Guild) sought in the district court to vacate the award of an arbitrator chosen under a collective bargaining agreement to settle a dispute arising under the agreement as to salaries of certain employees. This appeal is from an order of the district court granting appellee's motion for a summary judgment.
The dispute involves the interaction of two separate schedules in the contract. The arbitrator analyzed the schedules and reached a result. The Guild concedes that the arbitrator relied "only on the language of the contract itself", but urges that the award is based upon an interpretation of the contract which is not possible.
It is not the function of the courts to review the merits of arbitration awards. The interpretation of a collective bargaining agreement is a question for the arbitrator. It is the arbitrator's construction that was bargained for; and so far as the arbitrator's decision concerns construction of the contract, the courts have no business overruling him, because their interpretation of the contract is different than his. An award is legitimate if it draws its essence from the agreement and only when the arbitrator's words manifest an infidelity to this obligation may the courts refuse enforcement of the award. (United Steelworkers of America v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp., 363 U.S. 593, 80 S.Ct. 1358, 4 L.Ed.2d 1424 (1960).)
It certainly does not appear from the arbitrator's words that he was unfaithful to the contract, and it does appear from the award that he made a serious effort to resolve the dispute by applying the words of the contract to the facts.
Without expressing our views as to the proper construction of the agreement we do believe that it is possible for an honest intellect to interpret the words of the contract and reach the result which the arbitrator reached. Under United Steelworkers of America v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp., supra, we do not believe it to be our function to inquire further.1
Affirmed.
* Honorable Russell E. Smith, ...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Stead Motors of Walnut Creek v. Automotive Machinists Lodge No. 1173, Intern. Ass'n of Machinists and Aerospace Workers
...wishes of all the parties to it, is ordinarily an invalid exercise of our power. See, e.g. San Francisco-Oakland Newspaper Guild v. Tribune Pub. Co., 407 F.2d 1327, 1327 (9th Cir.1969) (per curiam) ("It is the arbitrator's construction that was bargained for; and so far as the arbitrator's ......
-
INTERN. BROTH. OF ELEC. WKRS., NO. 323 v. CORAL ELEC.
...words manifest an infidelity to the obligation may the courts refuse enforcement of the award. San Francisco-Oakland Newspaper Guild v. Tribune Publishing Co., 407 F.2d 1327, 1327 (9th Cir.1969) (relying upon the Steelworkers Triology); see International Association of Machinists v. Texas S......
-
Washington Hosp. Center v. Service Employees Intern. Union Local 722, AFL-CIO, AFL-CIO
...561 (1969); or discloses an interpretation not "possible for an honest intellect to ... reach," San Francisco-Oakland Newspaper Guild v. Tribune Pub. Co., 407 F.2d 1327, 1328 (9th Cir.1969). See, Kaden, Judges and Arbitrators: Observations on the Scope of Judicial Review, 80 Colum.L.Rev. 26......
-
Sheeder v. Eastern Express, Inc., Civ. A. No. 73-1040.
...of America v. Enterprise Wheel and Car Corp., 363 U.S. 593, 80 S.Ct. 1358, 4 L.Ed.2d 1424 (1960); San Francisco-Oakland Newspaper Guild v. Tribune Publishing Co., 407 F.2d 1327 (9th Cir. 1969); Ludwig Honnold Manufacturing Co. v. Fletcher, 405 F.2d 1123 (3d Cir. 1969). Appellants have not c......